Re: [Tagging] Narrow Bridge (was: Reconstructing «Dificult passability» proposal to «Obstacle»)

2012-10-17 Thread Kytömaa Lauri
>> I don't like the "lanes" tag where there are no lines on the street, it >> misses the point. >It completely misses the point! The lanes tag should only be used for lanes >that are somehow marked - usually with lines. There are an abundance of unpaved, 6 to 8, or even 10 meter wide roads that

Re: [Tagging] Narrow Bridge (was: Reconstructing «Dificult passability» proposal to «Obstacle»)

2012-10-13 Thread Philip Barnes
On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 22:19 -0500, John F. Eldredge wrote: > > The standard English term for a bridge that is only wide enough for one > vehicle to pass through at a time is a "one-lane bridge". In the same way, a > roadway only wide enough for one vehicle at a time is a "one-lane road". The

Re: [Tagging] Narrow Bridge (was: Reconstructing «Dificult passability» proposal to «Obstacle»)

2012-10-13 Thread John F. Eldredge
"Janko Mihelić" wrote: > Well, "car" as a unit of road width can be used with the "lanes" tag. > If it > catches on it can be put as a proposal. > > I don't like the "lanes" tag where there are no lines on the street, > it > misses the point. > > Janko > > 2012/10/13 Stephen Hope > > > Eric,

Re: [Tagging] Narrow Bridge (was: Reconstructing «Dificult passability» proposal to «Obstacle»)

2012-10-13 Thread David ``Smith''
On Oct 13, 2012 5:45 PM, "Martin Koppenhoefer" wrote: > > 2012/10/13 Martin Vonwald (imagic) : > > Am 13.10.2012 um 14:48 schrieb Janko Mihelić : > > > >> I don't like the "lanes" tag where there are no lines on the street, it misses the point. > > > > It completely misses the point! The lanes tag

Re: [Tagging] Narrow Bridge (was: Reconstructing «Dificult passability» proposal to «Obstacle»)

2012-10-13 Thread Philip Barnes
I can see nothing wrong with tagging a single track road as lanes =1. Single track roads are rarely the same width along their entire length, and the term will be understood by UK drivers. Usual width is, I would guess, between 2.5 and 3 metres, but this varies. Sometimes, but not often there ar

Re: [Tagging] Narrow Bridge (was: Reconstructing «Dificult passability» proposal to «Obstacle»)

2012-10-13 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2012/10/13 Martin Vonwald (imagic) : > Am 13.10.2012 um 14:48 schrieb Janko Mihelić : > >> I don't like the "lanes" tag where there are no lines on the street, it >> misses the point. > > It completely misses the point! The lanes tag should only be used for lanes > that are somehow marked - usual

Re: [Tagging] Narrow Bridge (was: Reconstructing «Dificult passability» proposal to «Obstacle»)

2012-10-13 Thread Martin Vonwald (imagic)
Am 13.10.2012 um 14:48 schrieb Janko Mihelić : > I don't like the "lanes" tag where there are no lines on the street, it > misses the point. It completely misses the point! The lanes tag should only be used for lanes that are somehow marked - usually with lines. A narrow bridge is a narrow bri

Re: [Tagging] Narrow Bridge (was: Reconstructing «Dificult passability» proposal to «Obstacle»)

2012-10-13 Thread Janko Mihelić
Well, "car" as a unit of road width can be used with the "lanes" tag. If it catches on it can be put as a proposal. I don't like the "lanes" tag where there are no lines on the street, it misses the point. Janko 2012/10/13 Stephen Hope > Eric, > > The English version did say that at one point,

Re: [Tagging] Narrow Bridge (was: Reconstructing «Dificult passability» proposal to «Obstacle»)

2012-10-12 Thread Stephen Hope
Eric, The English version did say that at one point, as well, before it was changed back to the current definition. Maybe the French one was copied from it during that period. Stephen On 13 October 2012 04:49, Eric SIBERT wrote: > >> Indeed, as pointed out by Martin, I have to use lanes=1. I

[Tagging] Narrow Bridge (was: Reconstructing «Dificult passability» proposal to «Obstacle»)

2012-10-12 Thread Eric SIBERT
- a narrow bridge i.e. you can't cross a vehicle in opposite direction. We may use width=* but it is difficult to get it precisely. obstacle=narrowness It's slightly offtopic, but wouldn't it be logical to use "car" as a non accurate unit of length? So you can have a tag like "width=