It started as my personal summary of tags, but in the meantime it looks
like it got a rather comprehensive summary of current tagging practice.
I don't really know where to start cleaning up the Wiki, because this
also means to remove some of the existing pages and replace them.
I'm happy if
Jan,
I see you have done much work on this topic on your page
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging); why
didn't you include these informations on the general Wiki pages instead of your
user pages?
Regards.
--
Nouvelle adresse mail : penegal...@protonmail.com
S
To Jan Michel (I did not have your mail, as I unsubscribed of the list mails to
avoid cluttering my mailbox): the goal of my request is not to assist routing
software in finding a route, but to help navigation software to display the
destination signs as they are on the ground. If a destination
Hi,
On 01.08.20 15:48, David Marchal via Tagging wrote:
Hm, it seems a smart way to manage such cases; I could add the
restrictions on the relation, like hazmat:water=no or maxweight=12. I
assume that, in such cases, I must create a destination_sign relation
for unrestricted destinations, and
Hm, it seems a smart way to manage such cases; I could add the restrictions on
the relation, like hazmat:water=no or maxweight=12. I assume that, in such
cases, I must create a destination_sign relation for unrestricted destinations,
and one for each destination restriction (if there are several
sent from a phone
> On 1. Aug 2020, at 11:28, Jan Michel wrote:
>
> The access tag is 'maxweightrating' like 'maxweight' or 'maxheight'. In the
> value of conditional tags there is no 'max' because there we refer to actual
> values and not limits. We use 'weight', 'height' and hence also
>
On 31.07.20 21:07, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
On 31. Jul 2020, at 18:01, Jan Michel wrote:
I'm not familiar with French rules, but is it the actual weight or the allowed
total weight of the vehicle that matters? If it's the latter, you can use
'weightrating' instead of 'weight'.
shouldn’t th
While you're talking about the destination tag, I think when using a
destination_sign relation it's best to apply the mode as eg.
bicycle=designated, eg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11345354#map=18/-33.82573/151.21308
for https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/VIq-OPTiw0BVI7gqdLR-iA
On Fri, 3
sent from a phone
> On 31. Jul 2020, at 18:01, Jan Michel wrote:
>
> I'm not familiar with French rules, but is it the actual weight or the
> allowed total weight of the vehicle that matters? If it's the latter, you can
> use 'weightrating' instead of 'weight'.
shouldn’t that be „maxweight
Hi David,
On 31.07.20 15:53, David Marchal via Tagging wrote:
Hello, there.
I'm wondering, there are destination signs which only apply to some kind
of vehicles: for HGV, for bicycles, for pedestrians, for vehicles below
12t… How would I tag such destinations? The simple way would be to use,
No, such restrictions are typically not applied directly on the road indicated
by the sign; they are present on other road segments along the indicated route,
or may not be present at all, because the road network manager wants to
encourage some kinds of vehicles to use a specific route, without
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 8:53 AM David Marchal via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Hello, there.
>
> I'm wondering, there are destination signs which only apply to some kind
> of vehicles: for HGV, for bicycles, for pedestrians, for vehicles below
> 12t… How would I tag such destinati
Hello, there.
I'm wondering, there are destination signs which only apply to some kind of
vehicles: for HGV, for bicycles, for pedestrians, for vehicles below 12t… How
would I tag such destinations? The simple way would be to use, respectively,
destination:hgv=*, destination:bicycle=*, destinat
13 matches
Mail list logo
