2009/10/28 Lesi
> > how do you define "main area"?
> > Aren't the shafts vertical access / ventilation shafts that
> > lead to the inner mine? IMHO that defines them as
> > part of the mine (and indicates that they should be comprised).
>
> The main area is the area where all the bigger buildings
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> Yes, I mean status=*, and I'm aware that it doesn't avoid the problem -
>> however, the problem would have to be solved only once for all possible
>> status values. A check for status will filter out objects with e.g.
>> status=planned, too, even if only construction,
2009/10/21 Tobias Knerr :
> Dave F.:
>>> However, I believe that using a common key instead of
>>> disused/construction/abandoned/...=yes and distinguishing these using
>>> different *values* would have been the better alternative.
>> Common Key? Can you give an example?
>>
>> If you mean status=di
2009/10/24 Lesi :
> - In the forum somebody has suggested to add a tag for the name of the mine
> the mineshaft belongs to. At first I thought this would be the same as
> operator, but actually it is not. So which tag would be appropriate?
> mine=...?
to associate the mineshaft to the mine I'd no
If it's at the E&C they'll be wanting the quickest exit route ;-)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Cartinus wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 October 2009 01:54:17 Anthony wrote:
>> So what is a disused cafe?
>
> It's a building with a big sign on the outside that reads: "The Elephant and
> Castle". This big sign is flanked by a smaller sign that reads "Guinness".
> Then
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 01:54:17 Anthony wrote:
> So what is a disused cafe?
It's a building with a big sign on the outside that reads: "The Elephant and
Castle". This big sign is flanked by a smaller sign that reads "Guinness".
Then when you try to open the door it is locked. When you look
2009/10/20 Liz :
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Lesi wrote:
>> The
>> area of the mine can be tagged with landuse=industrial.
> Too broad a definition
>
> industrial covers too much
> mining is quite different a landuse
> heavy industry doesn't build up piles of waste (mullock heaps) and then have
> to r
2009/10/21 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> 2009/10/20 John Smith :
>> If most of the world only has low res sat imagery, and shaft heads
>> usually are only a few pixels wide on low res, so how do you mark them
>> if you can't get close to them?
>
> please stop it, what is your point? If you can't map it,
2009/10/20 John Smith :
> If most of the world only has low res sat imagery, and shaft heads
> usually are only a few pixels wide on low res, so how do you mark them
> if you can't get close to them?
please stop it, what is your point? If you can't map it, you won't do
it, but here we are talking
2009/10/20 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> 2009/10/20 John Smith :
>> There is probably a good reason only tourist attractions are mapped
>> because you wouldn't be allowed to go near one unless you worked
>> there, there is a mine shaft on the other side of town but I wouldn't
>> get anywhere near it.
>
>
2009/10/20 John Smith :
> There is probably a good reason only tourist attractions are mapped
> because you wouldn't be allowed to go near one unless you worked
> there, there is a mine shaft on the other side of town but I wouldn't
> get anywhere near it.
You're missing the point: this is not abo
12 matches
Mail list logo
