2016-09-02 10:55 GMT+02:00 Daniel Koć :
> actually, if it's just decorative, it's not art ;-)
>>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorative_arts
>
> =P
admittedly it is not completely clear what osm "artwork" is referring to
(it's "public art" according to the wiki), and whether you categoriz
W dniu 02.09.2016 8:15, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
actually, if it's just decorative, it's not art ;-)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorative_arts
=P
--
"To co ludzie zwą marskością wątroby/ Tak naprawdę jest śmiercią z
tęsknoty" [Afro Kolektyw]
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 02 set 2016, alle ore 00:35, Daniel Koć ha scritto:
>
> How do we know when "main purpose is to remind us of a person or an event" or
> is just decorative
actually, if it's just decorative, it's not art ;-)
cheers,
Martin
_
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
- historic=memorial + tourism=artwork + artwork_type=statue
>>
>> Which one should we use as canonical form?
>>
>
> I like the last one precisely because of the vague line between memorials
> and decorative pieces. If you don't know if it is a
pet, 2. ruj 2016. u 00:36 Daniel Koć napisao je:
> There are 3 equivalents of a common case (memorial in the form of
> statue):
> - historic=memorial + memorial:type=statue
> - historic=memorial + memorial=statue
> - historic=memorial + tourism=artwork + artwork_type=statue
>
> Which one should w
W dniu 31.08.2016 13:04, Janko Mihelić napisał(a):
čet, 25. kol 2016. u 15:30 Daniel Koć napisao je:
I've also noticed that the line between artworks and memorials is
blurred, especially with statues
In my opinion, we can use both tags. If something is a sculpture, add
tourism=artwork+artwor
