Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk-be] cadastral plan now open data

On 2018-09-22 01:08, Lionel Giard wrote: André, i don't really see your point with the argument you made about cadastre data. i don't know of anybody looking to use this data to add building into OSM. It is outdated data regarding buildings and roads in a lot of different place in Belgium. And

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk-be] cadastral plan now open data

sent from a phone > On 22. Sep 2018, at 01:18, André Pirard wrote: > > In Beijing, it was Google Maps that moved. > Satellites (several if I recall) were showing OSM in the right place. here is some information about the coordinate processing and geodata in general in China:

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk-be] cadastral plan now open data

On 2018-09-21 23:22, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 21. Sep 2018, at 21:32, André Pirard > wrote: The whole cadastral map is offset by that 7m. ... *Picture 3:* So, I dragged his parcel right onto the wall. And now it's correctly located,

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk-be] cadastral plan now open data

André, i don't really see your point with the argument you made about cadastre data. i don't know of anybody looking to use this data to add building into OSM. It is outdated data regarding buildings and roads in a lot of different place in Belgium. And as, the people at cadastre are not the

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk-be] cadastral plan now open data

sent from a phone > On 21. Sep 2018, at 21:32, André Pirard wrote: > > The whole cadastral map is offset by that 7m. > ... > > Picture 3: So, I dragged his parcel right onto the wall. > And now it's correctly located, aligned with the fencing all around. how did you know which source was