2014-06-16 0:23 GMT+02:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
survey is hence supposed to exist beside source information having
publication date or not, spoke to a local being generally knowledge etc.
is it a survey if I go to check in the archives of the municipality what
is the correct
Am 15/giu/2014 um 02:40 schrieb David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net:
Interestingly, its already contains the recommendation
source:name=survey 10 November 2012 - I was not aware of that !
wouldn't it be more interesting in this example what the actual source for the
name was (e.g. road
On 2014-06-15 22:11, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote :
Am 15/giu/2014 um 02:40 schrieb David
Bannon dban...@internode.on.net:
Interestingly, its already contains the recommendation
"source:name=survey 10 November 2012" - I was not aware of that
Hi,
Following this discussion here is a proposed clarification to Key:source
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source.
The goal is to define the word, make date mandatory, use ISO format,
define per source tag meaning.
Is there any objection or suggestion for changes?
*survey* -mm[-dd]
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 7:03 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Following this discussion here is a proposed clarification to Key:source
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source.
The goal is to define the word, make date mandatory, use ISO format,
define per source
Andre, sorry, I support what you are trying but not quite sure you have
the proposal ready yet. I cannot post to the Belgium list so assume you
see this on tagging ?
Can you please give a few examples of how the data would appear ? I
think that might clarify it. In particular, how you will
