Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Heavily-wooded residential polygons

On 8/6/20 10:16 pm, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: Jun 6, 2020, 06:20 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: On 3/6/20 7:22 am, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: Jun 2, 2020, 20:16 by stevea...@softworkers.com : "this IS residential

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Heavily-wooded residential polygons

Jun 6, 2020, 06:20 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > On 3/6/20 7:22 am, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > >> >> >> >> Jun 2, 2020, 20:16 by >> stevea...@softworkers.com>> : >> >>> "this IS residential landuse." (Not COULD BE, but IS). Yes, this >>> land might be "natural" now,

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Heavily-wooded residential polygons

On 5/6/20 10:46 am, Greg Troxel wrote: Sure. I tend to think that if something is semantically sensible and can be represented, it's good to tag it, and then rendering is another story. I think pretty much everyone agrees that landuse=residential and natural=wood are both sensible to

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Heavily-wooded residential polygons

On 3/6/20 7:22 am, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: Jun 2, 2020, 20:16 by stevea...@softworkers.com: "this IS residential landuse." (Not COULD BE, but IS). Yes, this land might be "natural" now, including being "treed," but I could still build a patio and bbq there after

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Heavily-wooded residential polygons

stevea writes: > We agree. The issues are both around the different behavior of the > (Carto) renderer when both landuse=residential and natural=wood are > combined (and there are highly complex ways they can be and are > "combined" in the OSM database), and around how mappers understand >

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Heavily-wooded residential polygons

Jun 2, 2020, 20:16 by stevea...@softworkers.com: > "this IS residential landuse." (Not COULD BE, but IS). Yes, this land might > be "natural" now, including being "treed," but I could still build a patio > and bbq there after perhaps cutting down some trees, it is my residential > land

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Heavily-wooded residential polygons

Jun 2, 2020, 13:11 by g...@lexort.com: > First, I'm going to assume that polygons for landuse=residential do or > are intended to align with property boundaries. > I think that it is not a good assumption. One may have a property boundary that is partially landuse=residential and partially

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Heavily-wooded residential polygons

stevea writes: > As I mentioned to Doug I exchanged a couple of emails with > user:jeisenberg (a principal contributor to Carto) about what was > going on with some examples of this, and Mr. Eisenberg explained to me > (in short) that it is a complicated ordering (or re-ordering) of > layers

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Heavily-wooded residential polygons

On 29/5/20 8:01 am, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: May 28, 2020, 23:54 by stevea...@softworkers.com: "treed farmland" or "heavily wooded residential" prove slightly problematic to OSM tagging. Map tree-covered area (landuse=forest) and map farmland (landuse=farmland) or

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Heavily-wooded residential polygons

May 28, 2020, 23:54 by stevea...@softworkers.com: > "treed farmland" or "heavily wooded residential" prove slightly problematic > to OSM tagging. > Map tree-covered area (landuse=forest) and map farmland (landuse=farmland) or residential (landuse=residential). Yes, the same area may be tree