Re: [Tagging] one-directinal bicycle dismount on oneway road ?

2014-01-20 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 19/gen/2014 um 19:23 schrieb Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl: Bottom line - we need a distinction between the vehicle (cycle) and the activity (cycling). yes, as others have mentioned, there was recently a discussion about this on tagging. the wiki defines bicycle as a legal tag

Re: [Tagging] one-directinal bicycle dismount on oneway road ?

2014-01-20 Thread John F. Eldredge
Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote: On 01/19/2014 07:23 PM, Colin Smale wrote: On 2014-01-19 18:32, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2014/1/19 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl mailto:colin.sm...@xs4all.nl The standard sign for no vehicles (red ring on white background) does

[Tagging] one-directinal bicycle dismount on oneway road ?

2014-01-19 Thread Volker Schmidt
I frequently need to map short pieces of a bicycle routes where cyclists have to dismount and walk their bicyle on a one-road in the wrong direction. I need something like a one-directinal bicycle dismount. Any suggestions? Volker Padova, Italy ___

Re: [Tagging] one-directinal bicycle dismount on oneway road ?

2014-01-19 Thread Colin Smale
I agree. In the UK there is a difference between no cycles and no cycling. Although in general you may be correct that a dismounted cyclist is effectively a pedestrian, there are also footways (or whatever you want to call them) signed as no cycles, which means that in these cases a

Re: [Tagging] one-directinal bicycle dismount on oneway road ?

2014-01-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014/1/19 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl there are also footways (or whatever you want to call them) signed as no cycles, which means that in these cases a dismounted cyclist is not equivalent to a pedestrian. If foot=yes (explicit or implied) implies bicycle=dismount which corresponds

Re: [Tagging] one-directinal bicycle dismount on oneway road ?

2014-01-19 Thread Georg Feddern
Am 19.01.2014 12:06, schrieb Colin Smale: In the UK there is a difference between no cycles and no cycling. Although in general you may be correct that a dismounted cyclist is effectively a pedestrian, there are also footways (or whatever you want to call them) signed as no cycles, which means

Re: [Tagging] one-directinal bicycle dismount on oneway road ?

2014-01-19 Thread Colin Smale
Well, certainly I have seen them applied to large permissive areas like shopping centres. If we don't use bicycle=no for this, how about bicycle=prohibited? The standard sign for no vehicles (red ring on white background) does not apply to bicycles being pushed by hand, but as a bicycle is

Re: [Tagging] one-directinal bicycle dismount on oneway road ?

2014-01-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014/1/19 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl Well, certainly I have seen them applied to large permissive areas like shopping centres. If we don't use bicycle=no for this, how about bicycle=prohibited? yes, it is also my guess that shopping centres might forbid bringing your bike even if

Re: [Tagging] one-directinal bicycle dismount on oneway road ?

2014-01-19 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On 01/19/2014 07:23 PM, Colin Smale wrote: On 2014-01-19 18:32, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2014/1/19 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl mailto:colin.sm...@xs4all.nl The standard sign for no vehicles (red ring on white background) does not apply to bicycles being pushed by hand,