sent from a phone
> Am 24.02.2016 um 11:52 schrieb Max :
>
> Where different people seem to be around. It's kind of tiring having to
> bring up all the arguments again because some haven't followed the
> discussion here.
yes, mailing list discussions in the archive
The discussion seems to be happening in the wiki now
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:tourism%3Dgallery#Problems_with_the_gallery_tag
Where different people seem to be around. It's kind of tiring having to
bring up all the arguments again because some haven't followed the
discussion
2016-02-17 13:30 GMT+01:00 Max :
> > +0.5, I'd actually make the latter contemporary_art_gallery, although it
> is long, it removes the ambiguity that art_gallery still has
>
> yes, but then there are galleries that are still selling works of
> (post-)modern, not
sent from a phone
> Am 11.02.2016 um 23:39 schrieb Max :
>
> I'd say so.1. depreciate tourism=gallery for museums, make it a subtype
> of tourism=museum.
> For actual galleries introduce amenity=art_gallery
+0.5, I'd actually make the latter
2016-02-11 2:44 GMT+01:00 Greg Troxel :
> We have to separate words that appear in names from tag definitions that
> happen to use the same words.
>
words in names are strong indications. The word "gallery" has multiple
meanings, that why the word "contemporary art gallery" is
On 2016년 01월 26일 15:53, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> On 26 January 2016 at 14:12, Marc Zoutendijk wrote:
>>> I would like :
>>> - discourage tourism=gallery
>>> - subtype of tourism=museum, museum=art just like
>>> museum=railway/history, and further art=painting/...
>>> - also
On 2016년 01월 25일 23:44, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The wiki defines the tag tourism=gallery as 'an area or typically a
> building that displays a variety of visual art exhibitions' [1]. This
> is an officially approved tag [2]. In addition, the wiki page on
> tourism=museum [3]
Indications, may be, but no more than that. What it is actually called
is subjective - it was a human decision at some point in the past.
Politics often plays a big role in that decision... What is *IS* can be
made more or less objective by reference to definitions.
On 2016-02-11 10:06, Martin
John Eldredge writes:
> There is a large art museum in Washington, DC, named the National Gallery.
Yes, but it's a museum that happens to have gallery in the name :-)
We have to separate words that appear in names from tag definitions that
happen to use the same words.
In the US, gallery can refer to a museum, but it more commonly refers to a
retail store selling art.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love can do that." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
On
There is a large art museum in Washington, DC, named the National Gallery.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love can do that." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
On January 26, 2016 4:29:17 AM
I agree there is a more fundamental problem.
This has been discussed in other places that I know of:
[french]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2015-January/074711.html
[carto]
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/883#issuecomment-81849889
My view is :
-
2016-01-26 10:43 GMT+01:00 althio :
> I would like :
> - discourage tourism=gallery
> - subtype of tourism=museum, museum=art just like
> museum=railway/history, and further art=painting/...
> - also redirect towards shop=art for badly tagged items
>
I agree we should
W dniu 26.01.2016 11:27, Gerd Petermann napisał(a):
althio wrote
It brings too much confusion, I take it for a bad case of duck
tagging.
I would like :
- discourage tourism=gallery
- subtype of tourism=museum, museum=art just like
museum=railway/history, and further art=painting/...
- also
On 26.01.2016 10:43, althio wrote:
> I would like :
> - discourage tourism=gallery
> - subtype of tourism=museum, museum=art just like
> museum=railway/history, and further art=painting/...
> - also redirect towards shop=art for badly tagged items
+1
0x2E165BB0.asc
Description:
althio wrote
> It brings too much confusion, I take it for a bad case of duck tagging.
>
> I would like :
> - discourage tourism=gallery
> - subtype of tourism=museum, museum=art just like
> museum=railway/history, and further art=painting/...
> - also redirect towards shop=art for badly tagged
> Op 26 jan. 2016, om 10:43 heeft althio het volgende
> geschreven:
>
>
> I would like :
> - discourage tourism=gallery
> - subtype of tourism=museum, museum=art just like
> museum=railway/history, and further art=painting/...
> - also redirect towards shop=art for
On 26 January 2016 at 14:12, Marc Zoutendijk wrote:
>> I would like :
>> - discourage tourism=gallery
>> - subtype of tourism=museum, museum=art just like
>> museum=railway/history, and further art=painting/...
>> - also redirect towards shop=art for badly tagged items
>>
Frederik Ramm
Wrote in message:
> Hi,
>
>the German word "Galerie" is often used for art showrooms where you
> can actually buy the stuff on display. (I know a couple that are not
> larger than a typical hairdresser's.) Hence I wouldn't be surprised if
> many of the 415
Hi all,
The wiki defines the tag tourism=gallery as 'an area or typically a
building that displays a variety of visual art exhibitions' [1]. This
is an officially approved tag [2]. In addition, the wiki page on
tourism=museum [3] specifies that art galleries should be tagged as
tourism=gallery,
On 26 January 2016 at 00:08, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>the German word "Galerie" is often used for art showrooms where you
> can actually buy the stuff on display. (I know a couple that are not
> larger than a typical hairdresser's.)
Note that we have shop=art for such
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> The wiki defines the tag tourism=gallery as 'an area or typically a
> building that displays a variety of visual art exhibitions' [1]. This
> is an officially approved tag [2]. In addition, the wiki page on
>
22 matches
Mail list logo