On 20/08/19 00:11, Kevin Kenny wrote:
(Summary: What do the data *consumers* want to see in the tagging for
route alternatives, circular routes, and routes that begin and end on
dual carriageways?)
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 3:47 AM Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
We do happen to have a clear rule for
My use-case for cycle.travel is having a single polyline that I can make into
a route guide at https://cycle.travel/routes . Currently there’s two dozen:
I’d like there to be thousands. So:
> - diversions and alternatives
Give them consistent roles so I can ignore them.
> - routes with
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 15:13, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> (Summary: What do the data *consumers* want to see in the tagging for
> route alternatives, circular routes, and routes that begin and end on
> dual carriageways?)
>
Since you've broadened the discussion to deal with more than just walking/
(Summary: What do the data *consumers* want to see in the tagging for
route alternatives, circular routes, and routes that begin and end on
dual carriageways?)
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 3:47 AM Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
> We do happen to have a clear rule for unbroken linear routes: just assemble
> in
