On 12/03/2012 04:32 PM, Christopher Baines wrote:
I can see the food issue is becoming a recurring theme, and this is
detracting from the main reason I put forward this proposal. I have now
removed the food references from the proposal, such that now, the
subjects of the relation would be school
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 12:33 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> +1, they'll most likely make an exception also for small orders if it
> is for a place a few steps from the "border", while they will probably
> make exceptions for larger orders also if it is a little more distant.
> IMHO for pizza se
2012/12/3 Colin Smale :
> postcode areas. A pizza delivery service is however always free to make an
> exception as it sees fit.
+1, they'll most likely make an exception also for small orders if it
is for a place a few steps from the "border", while they will probably
make exceptions for larger
In my mind there is a conceptual difference between formally defined
administrative areas and informal catchment areas. For the former, there
is (somewhere) a documented source of "the truth", whereas there is no
official document to describe the delivery area of a pizza restaurant.
Religious ad
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Christopher Baines wrote:
> After more consideration, and the helpful feedback from the list. I have
> revised the proposal [1]. It now uses a boundary relation. Once again,
> does anyone have any comments?
>
> 1: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_featur
If only a handful of people are likely to use the data (inevitable with
lots of overlapping catchments), then create it offline (draw it as a
separate layer in JOSM and save it). If more than 1 person will use it,
post it somewhere. You could add a link on the wiki city page.
But I wouldn't add ob
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 08:46 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/01/12 15:05, Chris Baines wrote:
> > As part of the Random Hacks of Kindness (RHoK) event, myself and a
> > friend have been working on the Granular Health Map problem [1]. We have
> > started trying to tackle the catchment ar
Hi,
On 12/01/12 15:05, Chris Baines wrote:
As part of the Random Hacks of Kindness (RHoK) event, myself and a
friend have been working on the Granular Health Map problem [1]. We have
started trying to tackle the catchment area problem, and have created a
proposal [2]. We both have some experienc
On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 14:05 +, Chris Baines wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As part of the Random Hacks of Kindness (RHoK) event, myself and a
> friend have been working on the Granular Health Map problem [1]. We
> have started trying to tackle the catchment area problem, and have
> created a proposal [2]. W
2012/12/1 Tobias Johansson :
> But I agree if we would have a layer-based interface in the future
> this could/should be added.
I hope we won't ever get a layer-based interface, because this would
cause a lot of trouble and discrepancies between the various layers.
One of the best ideas when OSM
2012/12/1 Christopher Baines :
> On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 09:24 -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> The problem with representing catchment areas in OSM is that it rapidly
>> gets into the "one database, one man's treasure, another's junk"
>> problem, because it leads to objects for things that don't really
2012/12/1 Christopher Baines :
> On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 15:39 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> I'd like to draw your attention to this proposal
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0
>> There are also examples and other useful links on the bottom of the page.
>
>
On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 15:39 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I'd like to draw your attention to this proposal
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0
> There are also examples and other useful links on the bottom of the page.
Thanks Martin, I have been looking in
On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 09:24 -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
> The problem with representing catchment areas in OSM is that it rapidly
> gets into the "one database, one man's treasure, another's junk"
> problem, because it leads to objects for things that don't really exist,
> but are only enshrined in p
2012/12/1 Chris Baines :
> As part of the Random Hacks of Kindness (RHoK) event, myself and a friend
> have been working on the Granular Health Map problem [1]. We have started
> trying to tackle the catchment area problem, and have created a proposal
> [2]. We both have some experience mapping in
Chris Baines writes:
> 1: http://www.rhok.org/problems/granular-health-map
> 2: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Catchment
The problem with representing catchment areas in OSM is that it rapidly
gets into the "one database, one man's treasure, another's junk"
problem, becau
Hi,
As part of the Random Hacks of Kindness (RHoK) event, myself and a friend
have been working on the Granular Health Map problem [1]. We have started
trying to tackle the catchment area problem, and have created a proposal
[2]. We both have some experience mapping in OSM, but not any about
propo
17 matches
Mail list logo
