On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
what about landmark=yes?
But I understand that many landmarks will not interest seamen. So it
is important for them to have a special indicator saying this is a
landmark for seamen. But where I don't agree is to
On 24.11.12 20:59, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
what about landmark=yes?
IMO it should read maritime_landmark=yes to indicate, that this tower or
building or quary or whatever is a landmark that is suitable for maritime
navigation. This key can then be used for a maritime map to decide whether to
Hi,
Disclaimer: I have nothing to do with the SeaMap, I'm just a coast dweller.
Am 23.11.2012 11:48, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
True - a cemetery is a cemetery and whether or not cemeteries are used
as landmarks by seamen doesn't change that.
I do not see, that the seamark:xxx=cemetery will
2012/11/23 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
If you call:
landuse=cemetery + landmark=cemetery + seamark=landmark +
seamark:type=landmark + seamark:landmark:category = cemetery
not duplicates, I don't know what you need more for duplicates ;-)
+1
what about landmark=yes? I find it strange too, that
Any tag whose key is in the form seamark: is from the OpenSeaMap
tagging scheme. Landmarks that bear these tags are features that can be
seen from the sea or river and can be usefully used for navigational
purposes. This is additional information, not duplicate information, so
they may
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Malcolm Herring
malcolm.herr...@btinternet.com wrote:
This is additional information, not duplicate information, so they may well
co-exist with the conventional OSM tags for whatever type of map feature the
object is.
If you call:
landuse=cemetery +
On 23/11/2012 10:24, Pieren wrote:
landuse=cemetery + landmark=cemetery + seamark=landmark +
seamark:type=landmark + seamark:landmark:category = cemetery
As I said, those latter two tags would only appear on cemeteries that
can be seen from the water and can be used as navigational markers.
Hi,
On 11/23/2012 11:24 AM, Pieren wrote:
As I said, a simple landmark tag is enough. It does not need to
specifiy again it is a cemetery when we can combine it with already
existing OSM tags (like the landuse=cemetery). The tag can be
seamark = landmark or seamark:type=landmark, I don't care.
Hi,
On 11/23/2012 11:48 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
We have bothered much about that as long as OpenSeaMap
tagged offshore
haven't
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Tagging mailing list
Does something qualify as a seamark if it is visible from the sea? Maybe a
visible_from_sea=yes is enough?
Janko
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I have a suspicion that this duplication of tags is largely the
result of OpenSeaMap trying to opt out of the rest of the
community - if we use our own namespace then we don't
have to discuss with those landlubbers. We have not
bothered much about that as long as
Hi all,
By accident, I found the tag landmark=cemetery on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landmark%3Dcemetery
Then discovered that 9 cemeteries are tagged with landuse=cemetery +
landmark=cemetery. Some have even an additionnal seamark:type =
landmark :
12 matches
Mail list logo