2014-08-19 0:38 GMT+02:00 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
For example, I consider it problematic to duplicate the functionality of
the image key by allowing links to individual images. And I guess there
will be different opinions whether a wikidata link should always replace
commons links
FYI it will remain a numeric ID, so it's unlikely you will ever become
unagainst it.
Editor support may help in displaying a human readable tag, but that will
depend on the software, of course.
Jo
2014-08-19 8:52 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
2014-08-19 0:38 GMT+02:00
2014-08-19 9:11 GMT+02:00 Jo winfi...@gmail.com:
FYI it will remain a numeric ID, so it's unlikely you will ever become
unagainst it.
Editor support may help in displaying a human readable tag, but that will
depend on the software, of course.
Jo
2014-08-19 8:52 GMT+02:00 Mateusz
2014-08-17 20:45 GMT+02:00 Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
wrote:
What should we sue to link to Wikimedia commons categories like:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:St_Paul,_Birmingham
I've
Il giorno 18/ago/2014, alle ore 00:44, Andy Mabbett
a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk ha scritto:
OK, how's this :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons
as a start?
+1, but could have been in the proposal address space, given that it is not in
use...
Cheers,
Martin
On 18 August 2014 07:20, Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com wrote:
Some minor objects may have category/image on Wikimedia Commons but have no
wikidata and never will have -
see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Notability
In which case, pick the best/ most representative image, and
2014-08-18 9:25 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Il giorno 18/ago/2014, alle ore 00:44, Andy Mabbett
a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk ha scritto:
OK, how's this :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons
as a start?
+1, but could have been in
Perhaps such a category should only be tagged exactly when it's not linked
on a wikidata page.
Otherwise it seems unnecessary.
As Andreas mentioned, if people can add this tag even when it's linked on
the wikidata page, eventually people will start adding wikiquote=*
wikivoyage=* and so on.
Am 18.08.2014 10:15, schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
2014-08-18 9:25 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Il giorno 18/ago/2014, alle ore 00:44, Andy Mabbett
a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk mailto:a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk ha
Commons is getting its own Wikibase installation, in addition to being
present in Wikidata. So every photograph, video or audio is going to have
it's own Commons Wikibase ID, with structured properties about that item.
Each category will probably have it's own ID as well. The problem is, this
Some automatically evaluations to find tags with low numbers under main
name space would be useful, as I find these kind of page quite often and it
would ease administration.
I think that's the closest to what you want:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/taginfo/apidoc#api_4_keys_all
On 18 August 2014 13:43, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Please, move it under the proposal name space.
To what end?
Is there a counter proposal that means this might not be used?
Is there significant opposition, that means this might not be used?
Or is this just needless bureaucracy?
On 18 August 2014 22:00, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
Commons is getting its own Wikibase installation, in addition to being
present in Wikidata. So every photograph, video or audio is going to have
it's own Commons Wikibase ID, with structured properties about that item.
Each
Andy,
Usually there is no problem in creating a page documented the key or tag
you want to use.
I don't think this case is an exception.
The only thing is that a key/tag documented without a proposal is more
likely to have a future merge/redefinition/deprecation/etc.
2014-08-18 18:57 GMT-03:00
On 18.08.2014 23:57, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Is there significant opposition, that means this might not be used?
The key itself is probably relatively uncontroversial, but the details
need some discussion.
For example, I consider it problematic to duplicate the functionality of
the image key by
For example, I consider it problematic to duplicate the functionality of
the image key by allowing links to individual images. And I guess there
will be different opinions whether a wikidata link should always replace
commons links or whether they should coexist.
+1
2014-08-18 19:38
On 18 August 2014 23:38, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
The key itself is probably relatively uncontroversial, but the details
need some discussion.
I guess that's why we use a wiki, not tablets of stone. Be my guest.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
It seems that people are using commons= for two different purposes:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/commons#values
physical things that are freely available for common usage; like
bicycle pumps and community gardens, but also links to Wikimedia
Commons.
How should we resolve this? What
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
wrote:
What should we sue to link to Wikimedia commons categories like:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:St_Paul,_Birmingham
I've previously used Wikimedia_Commons=, but that's verbose; and I
seem to be
Il giorno 17/ago/2014, alle ore 13:45, Andy Mabbett
a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk ha scritto:
I've previously used Wikimedia_Commons=, but that's verbose; and I
seem to be alone in doing so.
+1
If this makes any sense (maybe exceptions, cases that can't be covered with
wikidata) I'd also
On 17 August 2014 19:45, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
wrote:
What should we sue to link to Wikimedia commons categories like:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:St_Paul,_Birmingham
I've
On 17 August 2014 21:31, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I've previously used Wikimedia_Commons=, but that's verbose; and I
seem to be alone in doing so.
+1
If this makes any sense (maybe exceptions, cases that can't be covered with
wikidata) I'd also suggest the long
That would be my preference, but there has been some resistance to
Wikidata tags, from people who prefer human-readable tag values; so I
tend to use one of each.
I think that would be better addressed by various tools grabbing the
name for the Wikidata ID and then displaying it. Otherwise we
23 matches
Mail list logo
