>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Tagging digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
> 5. Re: length= (François Lacombe)
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:13:38 +0100
> From: François Lacombe <fl.infosrese...@gmail.com>
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> <tagging@openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] length=
> Message-ID:
> <CAG0ygLcExWgiFbGqMV=Hv3RT-wf3RS-3RCEPE=uft1qfkom...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Since OSM editing tools aren't AutoCAD you can't be 100% precise on the
> geometry.
> Some small features can actually be summarized as nodes when drawing their
> shape sounds irrelevant regarding the cluttering it introduces.
>
> I'm sorry that was trivial for me.
> I won't draw a circle for a 5cm diameter pole and so on...
>
> That's why tags are intended for several kind of primitives instead of only
> one sometimes.
> *François Lacombe*
Francois if you’re using JOSM you’re be able to work
up till 0,06 - 0,04 =0,02 m accuracy and with the other tools flip, turn and so
on the complete structure, so I don’t agree, your able to work quit accurate up
to building standards.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
