Re: [Tagging] Dangerous waterways tagging

2018-07-24 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On 24 July 2018 at 18:49, François Lacombe wrote: > > No because water always flows, look at the left picture on the danger sign. > Sorry, couldn't see the water - just looked like a dry gully It's just that sometimes, hydroelectric operator releases big amount of > water wich completely and

Re: [Tagging] Dangerous waterways tagging: hazard?

2018-07-24 Thread Yves
The tag 'hazard' can be found on the whitewater wiki page, so I guess whatever tag is found here would be worth mentioned there. Yves Le 24 juillet 2018 12:51:39 GMT+02:00, ael a écrit : >On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:48:05PM +0200, François Lacombe wrote: >> >> As the discussion about

Re: [Tagging] Dangerous waterways tagging: hazard?

2018-07-24 Thread ael
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:48:05PM +0200, François Lacombe wrote: > > As the discussion about intermittent/seasonal/... on waterways goes on, > there is another thing to map: how waterways banks can be dangerous due to > sudden rise or lower water level. The obvious tag is hazard, but for some

Re: [Tagging] Dangerous waterways tagging

2018-07-24 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Dave, I agree about monsooon or snow melt. Regarding industrial operations involving downstream rivers, there are precise restrictions and perimeters may be publicly displayed like this https://imgur.com/a/TLhZcgE Regarding this particular place : The stream

Re: [Tagging] Dangerous waterways tagging

2018-07-24 Thread Dave F
Hi This is another one of those discussion which comes up every year or so. The perception of danger is subjective; which never fits well within OSM. Waterways are not dangerous in themselves. They are inanimate objects. They don't jump out & attack you as you walk by. It's the naive way

Re: [Tagging] Dangerous waterways tagging

2018-07-24 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Graeme, 2018-07-24 0:12 GMT+02:00 Graeme Fitzpatrick : > > On 24 July 2018 at 06:48, François Lacombe > wrote: > >> >> Then what could be the best way to tag it? >> No existing tag sounds suitable for this, even the idea of a single >> "permanence" key. >> > > I think intermittent would

Re: [Tagging] Dangerous waterways tagging

2018-07-23 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On 24 July 2018 at 06:48, François Lacombe wrote: > > Then what could be the best way to tag it? > No existing tag sounds suitable for this, even the idea of a single > "permanence" key. > I think intermittent would still be correct, because the water is only sometimes there? Saw reference to

[Tagging] Dangerous waterways tagging

2018-07-23 Thread François Lacombe
Hi, As the discussion about intermittent/seasonal/... on waterways goes on, there is another thing to map: how waterways banks can be dangerous due to sudden rise or lower water level. It is actually related to what we intend to map with intermittent or seasonal. For example in France, we often