> Am 17.04.2015 um 17:40 schrieb Friedrich Volkmann :
>
> Bridges? Masts? Fences? Rails? Flagpoles? Power lines?
>
> Maybe everything that looks like a building, smells like a building and
> behaves like a building, but not all structures.
bridges yes, the others not, see here for a long li
On 15.04.2015 11:54, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> People put building=* on any structure
>
> +1, and I am fine with it, just wanted to comment on "not all tanks are
> buildings" and point out that in OSM all structures are "buildings".
Bridges? Masts? Fences? Rails? Flagpoles? Power lines?
2015-04-15 6:15 GMT+02:00 johnw :
> we have building=farm_auxiliary, shed, and roof, so I think it is broader
> than the german definition.
>
please note I wrote _also_ in the German definition, the English definition
is the same.
>
> People put building=* on any structure
>
+1, and I am fin
On the other hand, there are thousands of man_made=storage_tank without a
building tag.
A rendering engine could make the "building" implicit. Or a mechanical
retag could add the building tag.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://li
On Apr 15, 2015, at 1:47 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Technically, buildings are a subset of man made structures, built for humans
> occupancy, btw also under German law (de: Gebäude vs bauliche Anlagen).
we have building=farm_auxiliary, shed, and roof, so I think it is broader than
the g
> Am 14.04.2015 um 13:05 schrieb fly :
>
> and not every storage_tank might be a building.
well, this is another question. Strictly, most of them are not buildings, they
are almost all structures, but OSM seems not to use this technical distinction.
Technically, buildings are a subset of m
Am 14.04.2015 um 11:34 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> 2015-04-14 7:20 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny :
>
>> I think that building=storage_tank would be even better.
>
>
>
> you can use both. Building is about a building typology, while man_made is
> about a function.
+1
and not every storage_tan
2015-04-14 7:20 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny :
> I think that building=storage_tank would be even better.
you can use both. Building is about a building typology, while man_made is
about a function.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
ht
Sorry, I thought about using man_made=storage tank and in addition
building=storage_tank (rather than mentioned building=yes).
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 22:43:18 -0700
Clifford Snow wrote:
> That ship has sailed. man_made=storage_tank is the standard. Maybe
> early on it should have been man_made=buil
A building=storage_tank only tells you what the building looks like from
the outside, and what was it's first purpose. It could very well be an
interesting hotel.
uto, 14. tra 2015. 07:45 Clifford Snow je napisao:
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Mateusz Konieczny
> wrote:
>
>> I think tha
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> I think that building=storage_tank would be even better.
That ship has sailed. man_made=storage_tank is the standard. Maybe early on
it should have been man_made=building, building=* but we have an accepted
standard.
I am curious by
I think that building=storage_tank would be even better.
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:54:56 -0700
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> For your inspection, upgrade of:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstorage_tank
> To "defacto" status on the wiki (as it has 100,000 uses).
>
> Note the German pa
For your inspection, upgrade of:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstorage_tank
To "defacto" status on the wiki (as it has 100,000 uses).
Note the German page has always asked for building=yes on this feature,
which
strikes me as both reasonable and a rendering hack.
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
