Re: [Tagging] Defining tag 'natural=wood' ...

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:14:08 +1100 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there an improvement to be made here? No, as any kind of wiki editing will not cause this tag to change meaning from "area covered by trees". This tag is used more than 3 000 000 times, in nearly all cases without

[Tagging] Defining tag 'natural=wood' ...

Hi, The present wiki description; /Forest. Sometimes considered to have restricted meaning "Woodland with no forestry". http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood /The definition then leaves 'forestry' up for interpretation. I would rather have something clear! / //An area of

Re: [Tagging] Defining tag 'natural=wood' ...

sent from a phone > Am 01.02.2016 um 02:32 schrieb Mike Thompson : > > I suggest we map landcover and landuse separately. +1 cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Defining tag 'natural=wood' ...

landuse and landcover are two different things, and I submit they should be mapped as such. One indicates how the land is being used, and the other what covers it. Obviously they are related, but they are not the same. In regards to "landcover" it should not matter whether the trees were planted