Hi,
On 6/14/19 5:49 PM, marc marc wrote:
> I think the proposals for a new tag should clearly say:
> - add such tag
> - edit the old tag description to point the new tag
> - write to editors to adapt presets
> - propose a mecanical edit, if necessary by splitting it up
> to avoid a global
On 15/06/19 08:57, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
Some people disapprove of editing a database object without checking
if it still exists, because an edit implies that you have confirmed
that the information about the feature is still correct.
I usually check on a web page, most of them have a
Some people disapprove of editing a database object without checking
if it still exists, because an edit implies that you have confirmed
that the information about the feature is still correct.
Back to the original question: should diplomatic=honorary_consulate
and the related tags be marked as
Le 14.06.19 à 21:26, Lionel Giard a écrit :
> we need an human review
I wonder what the added value to make a human review for changing
diplomatic=honorary_consulate
into
diplomatic=consulate + consulate=honorary_consulate
of course, some may be wrong, but this has nothing
to do with the tag
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 at 05:30, Lionel Giard wrote:
> So it will change with time and become more and more prevalent, but it
> takes time. We could always makes some sort of challenge by country to
> check the embassy/consulate/... to speed things up.
>
Wouldn't / shouldn't the name show what it
The editor presets are already changed (so any modification or new creation
of embassy, consulate or liaison use the new tagging scheme). The number of
diplomatic=* tag compared to the number of office=* tag is due to the fact
that the "diplomatic"=* tag was already existing but used slightly
Le 14.06.19 à 15:10, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
> we should be very reluctant to mark tags as deprecated (i.e. it
> should happen after their usage significantly dropped
in French we say "c'est le chat qui se mord la queue"
tag use changes little as long as presets do not change.
presets
Am Fr., 14. Juni 2019 um 13:40 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg <
joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>:
> Right.
>
> By "deprecated" this is what I mean: should the wiki pages be changed
> to make it clear that diplomatic=honorary_consulate is no longer
> preferred, and could be changed to
Right.
By "deprecated" this is what I mean: should the wiki pages be changed
to make it clear that diplomatic=honorary_consulate is no longer
preferred, and could be changed to diplomatic=consulate +
consulate=honorary_consulate ?
On 6/14/19, Lionel Giard wrote:
> I think that the only
I think that the only deprecated tag in the accepted proposal is
"amenity=embassy" (which is indicated on the wiki page too).
The wrong diplomatic value are just what old tagging scheme lead to. It
doesn't need to be deprecated to me as it never existed officially (i
think) - and it will probably
On 14/06/19 20:06, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I was checking the pages related to the office=diplomatic proposal,
which approved the tags diplomatic=embassy, diplomatic=consulate and
diplomatic=liaison - I just made pages for these 3 tags and added
=liaison to the key:diplomatic page.
Based on the
Hi,
in general, I try to avoid marking anything as deprecated. I think the
term only gives people wrong ideas. If anything, try to find wording
that says "today, most mappers prefer the X tag", but don't say "this
tag is deprecated" except in very clear circumstances, where an
overwhelming
I was checking the pages related to the office=diplomatic proposal,
which approved the tags diplomatic=embassy, diplomatic=consulate and
diplomatic=liaison - I just made pages for these 3 tags and added
=liaison to the key:diplomatic page.
Based on the proposal, I suspect that the other values
13 matches
Mail list logo
