Re: [Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page

2020-09-08 Thread Janko Mihelić
This is getting very metaphysical, and tags have been invented to be as practical as possible for the mapper [1]. If someone sees an old anchor on the ground, one of the first things that's going to pop into their mind is historic=anchor. That has happened 40 times, separately by several mappers

Re: [Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page

2020-09-07 Thread Paul Allen
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 23:06, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > On 7. Sep 2020, at 23:51, Paul Allen wrote: > > > > One has a plaque saying it is the birthplace of some important figure. > > The plaque is a historic memorial, the house it is attached to is just a > > house (as is the house next

Re: [Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page

2020-09-07 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 7. Sep 2020, at 23:51, Paul Allen wrote: > > One has a plaque saying it is the birthplace of some important figure. > The plaque is a historic memorial, the house it is attached to is just a > house (as is the house next door). we’ll be mapping the plaque anyway (and

Re: [Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page

2020-09-07 Thread Paul Allen
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 22:41, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > On 7. Sep 2020, at 23:29, Paul Allen wrote: > > > > It's a memorial or it's not. If it's not a memorial, and there just > because it looks > > nice (somebody else brought up that possibility, not me) it's artwork. > > I don’t find a

Re: [Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page

2020-09-07 Thread Paul Allen
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 22:37, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > On 7. Sep 2020, at 23:23, Paul Allen wrote: > > > > To say that something is historic means that it is important or > significant > > in history. > > importance and significance are quite relative and I have the impression > you are

Re: [Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page

2020-09-07 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 7. Sep 2020, at 23:29, Paul Allen wrote: > > It's a memorial or it's not. If it's not a memorial, and there just because > it looks > nice (somebody else brought up that possibility, not me) it's artwork. I don’t find a definition of art, work of art, where

Re: [Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page

2020-09-07 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 7. Sep 2020, at 23:23, Paul Allen wrote: > > To say that something is historic means that it is important or significant > in history. importance and significance are quite relative and I have the impression you are imagining the bar much higher than what we usually

Re: [Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page

2020-09-07 Thread Paul Allen
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 22:20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > On 7. Sep 2020, at 22:15, Paul Allen wrote: > > > > Possibly tourism=artwork > > I’d much rather go for historic=anchor Why historic=anchor rather than memorial? I can understand historic=cannon as it's a standalone item. Anchors

Re: [Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page

2020-09-07 Thread Paul Allen
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 21:54, Janko Mihelić wrote: > pon, 7. ruj 2020. u 22:15 Paul Allen napisao je: > >> In that case it would not be historic, just a random anchor put there >> because >> it looks pretty. Possibly tourism=artwork, but I'm not sure what would >> be a suitable artwork_type.

Re: [Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page

2020-09-07 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 7. Sep 2020, at 22:15, Paul Allen wrote: > > Possibly tourism=artwork I’d much rather go for historic=anchor than for tourism=artwork these are rarely public art Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page

2020-09-07 Thread Janko Mihelić
pon, 7. ruj 2020. u 22:15 Paul Allen napisao je: > In that case it would not be historic, just a random anchor put there > because > it looks pretty. Possibly tourism=artwork, but I'm not sure what would > be a suitable artwork_type. It's not really an installation or a > sculpture. > It's

Re: [Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page

2020-09-07 Thread Paul Allen
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 21:05, Janko Mihelić wrote: > pon, 7. ruj 2020. u 21:28 Paul Allen napisao je: > >> Sounds like a memorial to me. So maybe historic=memorial + >> memorial=anchor. >> > > Anchors are often not a memorial, just an anchor put somewhere because it > looks nice. > In that case

Re: [Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page

2020-09-07 Thread Janko Mihelić
pon, 7. ruj 2020. u 21:28 Paul Allen napisao je: > Sounds like a memorial to me. So maybe historic=memorial + > memorial=anchor. > Anchors are often not a memorial, just an anchor put somewhere because it looks nice. You can search for images of "anchors on display" [1]. I guess this would be a

Re: [Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page

2020-09-07 Thread Paul Allen
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 20:01, Janko Mihelić wrote: > Historic=anchor would be an anchor from a historic ship displayed as a > public memorial. An example: > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arizona_anchor_bolin_plaza.JPG > Sounds like a memorial to me. So maybe historic=memorial +

[Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page

2020-09-07 Thread Janko Mihelić
Historic=anchor would be an anchor from a historic ship displayed as a public memorial. An example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arizona_anchor_bolin_plaza.JPG There aren't many of these tags right now, 38 in total. I found info on about 10 of those, and they all fitted the description