> That's probably to be discussed over at tagging mailing list.
Sorry, forget this last sentence.
Given that there's like wheelchair=yes and kids_area=yes [1] one could
introduce s'thing like animal friendly properties to amenities (bar,
restaurant, hotel, ...).
But IMHO it should be declared as s
Hi,
There are similar keys like "wheelchair" and allowed vehicles in
streets (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access ).
If there's enough objectivity in the tag definition I'd support that.
That's probably to be discussed over at tagging mailing list.
:Stefan
2017-10-29 21:56 GMT+01:00 P
On Sun, 2017-10-29 at 21:29 +0100, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> On 29.10.2017 16:44, Andrew Hain wrote:
> > How should an establishment that bills itself as “the dog friendly
> > cafe” be tagged?
>
> dog=* is used 8615 times, of which 1875 are dog=yes.
> 5498 uses are on highways, 854 on amenities and 111
On 29.10.2017 16:44, Andrew Hain wrote:
How should an establishment that bills itself as “the dog friendly cafe” be
tagged?
dog=* is used 8615 times, of which 1875 are dog=yes.
5498 uses are on highways, 854 on amenities and 1114 together with opening_hours
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/k
How should an establishment that bills itself as “the dog friendly cafe” be
tagged?
--
Andrew
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
