Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - building:architecture:preromanesque

2017-08-30 Thread marc marc
> El 24/8/2017 12:41, "Andy Townsend" escribió: > if you find a tag useful, just use it (and > if it's not documented, document it). +1 There was no opposition It is a good idea to have spoken here, but the vote seems useless on this very specialized point so just do it :)

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - building:architecture:preromanesque

2017-08-30 Thread Andy Townsend
On 30/08/2017 10:38, José G Moya Y. wrote: So you think I can add this tag to the wiki without prior voting? Yes, although I'd definitely use https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ first to see if anyone is using another tag to try and express the same idea. Best Regards, Andy

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - building:architecture:preromanesque

2017-08-30 Thread José G Moya Y .
So you think I can add this tag to the wiki without prior voting? El 24/8/2017 12:41, "Andy Townsend" escribió: > On 18/08/2017 10:22, José G Moya Y. wrote: > > > In my country, this tag could be used to describe "mozarabic" buildings > along with "visigothic" buildings. I

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - building:architecture:preromanesque

2017-08-25 Thread Jerry Clough - OSM
ture with products of the Carolingian Renaissance may not be that useful. Regards, Jerry From: José G Moya Y. <josem...@gmail.com> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Sent: Friday, 18 August 2017, 10:58 Subject: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - building:architecture:preromanesque

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - building:architecture:preromanesque

2017-08-24 Thread Andy Townsend
On 18/08/2017 10:22, José G Moya Y. wrote: In my country, this tag could be used to describe "mozarabic" buildings along with "visigothic" buildings. I hope this be useful to other european countries, too. Personally, I'd say that if you find a tag useful, just use it (and if it's not

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - building:architecture:preromanesque

2017-08-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-08-23 9:58 GMT+02:00 José G Moya Y. : > El 23/8/2017 1:01, "Martin Koppenhoefer" escrib > > > I suggest you also have a look at > > historic:civilization=* and see if this > > could be useful for your mapping. > > I took a look to

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - building:architecture:preromanesque

2017-08-23 Thread José G Moya Y .
El 23/8/2017 1:01, "Martin Koppenhoefer" escrib > I suggest you also have a look at > historic:civilization=* and see if this > could be useful for your mapping. I took a look to historic=civilization but none of the current values matches it (well, maybe

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - building:architecture:preromanesque

2017-08-22 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 18. Aug 2017, at 11:22, José G Moya Y. wrote: > > I propose this tag to describe middle age buildings created before the > "romanesque revolution" of the 11th century. I guess english people would > like something like "celtic", but I am using

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - building:architecture:preromanesque

2017-08-18 Thread José G Moya Y .
I propose this tag to describe middle age buildings created before the "romanesque revolution" of the 11th century. I guess english people would like something like "celtic", but I am using "preromanesque" instead of "celtic" because in Spain there is no "celtic" middle age architecture. In my