s.
Cheers
Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram
-Original Message-
From: Sören Reinecke via Tagging
Reply-To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <
tagging@openstreetmap.org>
To: Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Cc: Sören Reinecke
Subject: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (cha
sent from a phone
> On 5. Dec 2019, at 21:41, Jan Michel wrote:
>
> Also, introducing another set of 7 tags for such a minor piece of information
> is (at least to me) an absolute overkill.
my suggestion if you want to map these in great detail would be mapping the
bathrooms (or other thin
Hi Sören
Multiple tags are only needed if each of them describes a different
property, which is not the case for changing_table:location. I don't
see a problem with adding two or more values separated by a semicolon
in this case. In the contrary: a value list is clearer and it seems
that it can be
Hi,
I very much prefer the already accepted version. There is nothing wrong
with semicolon separated values. Searching for one key and splitting its
value is so much faster than searching with wildcards in a huge database
like ours.
Also, introducing another set of 7 tags for such a minor piece
Hey all,
A new but small proposal to change the specification for subkey
`changing_table:location` because of a discussion yesterday about using
seperators in values. I totally agree that we should avoid using
seperators when possible.
Proposal:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_featur
