Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carport

2017-02-12 Thread Joachim
I thought the same now: Discussion was positive and the tag is already in use. So I created the feature page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dcarport and set the status of the feature and the proposal to "in Use". Thanks Joachim 2017-02-04 20:40 GMT+01:00 Yves : > I think here t

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carport

2017-02-09 Thread John Willis
> On Feb 8, 2017, at 1:55 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > +1, building=carport is ok IMHO in the building tag tradition, it's the same > specificity as building=garage. +1 Javbw ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://list

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carport

2017-02-07 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-02-07 15:32 GMT+01:00 markus schnalke : > building=residential and building=house have the same tagging > structure although one is the super class of the other. > yes, they are both describing a building typology, but on different detail level. We have a very flat hierarchy in the building

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carport

2017-02-07 Thread markus schnalke
[2017-02-04 18:56] Joachim > > A carport is distinctive enough from building=garage and building=roof > so that an own tag should be used. [...] > The key building=* is used since a carport is a type > of building=roof. Funny how you first try to set the carport apart from the roof and then, when

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carport

2017-02-04 Thread Tom Pfeifer
On 04.02.2017 21:25, Warin wrote: I see no difference from building=roof with amenity=parking... and I would think rendering would be the same. No. building=carport describes a particular building style, which is common enough to justify a more special tag than =roof. Amenity should not be u

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carport

2017-02-04 Thread Warin
I see no difference from building=roof with amenity=parking... and I would think rendering would be the same. On 05-Feb-17 06:40 AM, Yves wrote: I think here that no comment means not controversial, you should move away the page from proposal to document an established tag and that's it. Yves

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carport

2017-02-04 Thread Yves
I think here that no comment means not controversial, you should move away the page from proposal to document an established tag and that's it. Yves Le 4 février 2017 18:56:29 GMT+01:00, Joachim a écrit : >This is the second RfC since the first one got no comments >(https://lists.openstreetma

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carport

2017-02-04 Thread Joachim
This is the second RfC since the first one got no comments (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-September/030292.html). The tag building=carport is used for one carport building. The carport might provide more than one parking space. It is not necessary that the carport is curre