Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Deprecate healthcare=pharmacy

2020-04-29 Thread Paul Allen
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 01:33, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > It is not impossible, but you need convince people to deprecate old tag. > Not impossible, but it helps a lot if editors incorporate it into their presets and standard carto renders it. It also

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Deprecate healthcare=pharmacy

2020-04-29 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Apr 28, 2020, 21:27 by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com: > Hello, > > Le 28.04.20 à 19:14, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit : > >> The original key amenity=* is a reasonable choice. This has been >> confirmed with extensive usage of amenity=pharmacy by mappers and >> database users: >> > > egg & chiken issue

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Deprecate healthcare=pharmacy

2020-04-28 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
while I also don’t see an urgent need to deprecate healthcare=pharmacy, I neither see a compelling reason to use it for “normal pharmacies” (those that are tagged as amenity=pharmacy with dispensing=yes/no). As long as there isn’t a “fix” to remove the amenity tag, the double tagging is not

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Deprecate healthcare=pharmacy

2020-04-28 Thread Warin
On 29/4/20 5:55 am, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: But healthcare=pharmacy was never proposed. There is no requirement that it must be proposed. It was added by a preset in iD. At the time the key “healthcare=“ was proposed, the idea of changing amenity=pharmacy was opposed by several mappers

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Deprecate healthcare=pharmacy

2020-04-28 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
But healthcare=pharmacy was never proposed. It was added by a preset in iD. At the time the key “healthcare=“ was proposed, the idea of changing amenity=pharmacy was opposed by several mappers during the RFC period (in 2010), so the idea to change to shop=pharmacy was dropped. —Joseph Eisenberg

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Deprecate healthcare=pharmacy

2020-04-28 Thread Marc M.
Hello, Le 28.04.20 à 19:14, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit : > The original key amenity=* is a reasonable choice. This has been > confirmed with extensive usage of amenity=pharmacy by mappers and > database users: egg & chiken issue : a proposal to depreciate a heavily used tag is rejected because

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Deprecate healthcare=pharmacy

2020-04-28 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
I certainly understand that pharmacies provide some healthcare-related services. In many countries a pharmacist can recommend and sell certain medications without the patient needing to see a physician, so they are both a retail business + a healthcare service. But amenity=pharmacy is just fine

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Deprecate healthcare=pharmacy

2020-04-28 Thread Paul Allen
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 18:16, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: Approving this proposal will re-affirm the previous approval of > amenity=pharma. This will make it clear that healthcare=pharmacy is not > needed and should be deprecated. > All very logical and well-reasoned. But... In the UK people are

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Deprecate healthcare=pharmacy

2020-04-28 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
The tag amenity=pharmacy was approved in 2006 and since then has been the consensus tag for mapping pharmacies. I propose to deprecate the recently-created tag healthcare=pharmacy, which was added as a preset in one editor application about 2 years ago, and therefore is often automatically added