On 26 December 2015 at 13:13, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> I would write "discouraged" rather than "DISCOURAGED".
I can change it in the main text, but I'd prefer to leave it like that
in the description, so it's more clear to users of Taginfo that the
tag should not be used.
-- Matthijd
On Fri, 25 Dec 2015 23:13:49 +0100
Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created a proposal page to explicitly mark the tag
> amenity=swimming_pool as deprecated in the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Discourage_amenity%3Dswimming_pool
>
> The proposal is
Yes, this is intentional, as there are more people that believe the
Wiki can discourage than there are that believe the Wiki can
deprecate. In the e-mail, I meant to write 'discourage' as well.
-- Matthijs
On 26 December 2015 at 00:22, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> You use both 'discouraged' and 'depreca
You use both 'discouraged' and 'deprecated' in your mail.
The wiki has a list of Deprecated features, only. Is it intentional
that your proposal calls for discouraging and not deprecating?
Matthijs Melissen wrote on 2015/12/25 23:13:
Hi all,
I have created a proposal page to explicitly mark the
Hi all,
I have created a proposal page to explicitly mark the tag
amenity=swimming_pool as deprecated in the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Discourage_amenity%3Dswimming_pool
The proposal is deliberately rather basic and does not contain a lot
of documentation on sugg
