On 22/07/12 00:56, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> On 19.07.2012 23:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>>> To clarify: This is a "moving walkway" that never moves anymore, but you
>>> can still walk on ?
>>
>> Yes. Probably disused=yes would be better than conveying=disused because
>> this way you could stil
On 19.07.2012 23:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>> To clarify: This is a "moving walkway" that never moves anymore, but you
>> can still walk on ?
>
> Yes. Probably disused=yes would be better than conveying=disused because this
> way you could still keep the information whether it is an
> es
Am 19.07.2012 um 23:40 schrieb Tobias Knerr :
> 18.07.2012 21:04, Martin Koppenhoefer:
>> Maybe there could be an additional value proposal for
>> "conveying" for cases where there is a moving walkway, but it is out
>> of order (for years in the case I am thinking about). Maybe
>> conveying=di
18.07.2012 21:04, Martin Koppenhoefer:
> Maybe there could be an additional value proposal for
> "conveying" for cases where there is a moving walkway, but it is out
> of order (for years in the case I am thinking about). Maybe
> conveying=disused ?
To clarify: This is a "moving walkway" that neve
Am 18.07.2012 21:30, schrieb Philip Barnes:
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 17:51 +0200, Peter Wendorff wrote:
Hi.
Probably add access as a useful combination to it: often shopping cars,
strollers, roller skates, bikes etc. are forbidden on escalators explicitely
How about skis?
Sorry I couldn't resist
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 17:51 +0200, Peter Wendorff wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Probably add access as a useful combination to it: often shopping cars,
> strollers, roller skates, bikes etc. are forbidden on escalators explicitely
>
How about skis?
Sorry I couldn't resist, this guy is a touch-in short of an
2012/7/18 Tobias Knerr :
> On 03.06.2012 17:53, Andreas Hubel wrote:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Escalators_and_Moving_Walkways
>
> The proposal has been updated to take feedback from the wiki talk page
> into account. If you are interested, I suggest you review it again
18.07.2012 17:51, Peter Wendorff:
> Probably add access as a useful combination to it
I've added a link to access tagging in the "other useful tags" section.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagg
Hi.
Probably add access as a useful combination to it: often shopping cars,
strollers, roller skates, bikes etc. are forbidden on escalators explicitely
regards
Peter
Am 18.07.2012 17:15, schrieb Tobias Knerr:
On 03.06.2012 17:53, Andreas Hubel wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Prop
On 03.06.2012 17:53, Andreas Hubel wrote:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Escalators_and_Moving_Walkways
The proposal has been updated to take feedback from the wiki talk page
into account. If you are interested, I suggest you review it again.
Voting will be started soon if
Hi,
Tobias and I wrote down some thoughts regarding escalators and moving walkways.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Escalators_and_Moving_Walkways
Please comment! ;-)
Greets,
Tobias and Andi
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@op
11 matches
Mail list logo
