Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Jewellery shop
The approved way of tagging is using the AE spelling. Approved by the use of the tag by thousands of mappers. Spelling it different could be treated as a misspelled tag. So "fixing" it is not that surprising. Bad luck for those who invented it in the wrong spelling. Now it is too late for changing it giving very little benefit. Stephan On January 26, 2016 12:08:59 PM GMT+01:00, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >2016-01-26 12:01 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer >: > >> against another one with 187, then the decision has already been >> made by the mappers. >> > > >btw: there seem to be people changing the spelling of these from BE to >AE, >I have in the past added shop=jewellery and looking at them now shows >they >have been changed in the meantime. > >Cheers, >Martin > > > > >___ >Tagging mailing list >Tagging@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Jewellery shop
2016-01-26 12:01 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > against another one with 187, then the decision has already been > made by the mappers. > btw: there seem to be people changing the spelling of these from BE to AE, I have in the past added shop=jewellery and looking at them now shows they have been changed in the meantime. Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Jewellery shop
2016-01-26 11:07 GMT+01:00 Hakuch : > against another one with 187, then the decision has already been > made by the mappers. > or by the people making the editor presets and rendering rules, autocompletion. How many people are typing tags and override the autocompletion suggestion, and then decide to deliberately use a tag that is not highlighted in their editor as valid if another one with small spelling differences is? If we get common applications (josm, iD) to render the british spelled version, many mappers will likely follow. Fortunately osm-carto does render both spelling variants! Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Jewellery shop
On 25.01.2016 23:24, Matthijs Melissen wrote: > Hi all, > > The tag shop=jewelry is one of the few tags that use American rather > than British English. The previous discussion seemed to indicate that > people have strong opinions on this topic, but that there is no strong > consensus either way. > > I have therefore created a proposal page for the tag shop=jewellery. > Hopefully this proposal, and a possible vote, will help the community > to create an opinion on this topic. > > The proposal can be found here: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Jewellery_shop > > Please let me know what you think. I think there is no sense in changing just a label, its more a kind of a hygienic operation. If a tag is so well supported like jewelry (over 20.000) against another one with 187, then the decision has already been made by the mappers. 0x3CBE432B.asc Description: application/pgp-keys ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Jewellery shop
Hi all, The tag shop=jewelry is one of the few tags that use American rather than British English. The previous discussion seemed to indicate that people have strong opinions on this topic, but that there is no strong consensus either way. I have therefore created a proposal page for the tag shop=jewellery. Hopefully this proposal, and a possible vote, will help the community to create an opinion on this topic. The proposal can be found here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Jewellery_shop Please let me know what you think. -- Matthijs ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
