Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

On 9/10/22 19:55, Illia Marchenko wrote: I withdrew this proposal. Thanks for your feedback! Thanks for the effort. Something does need to be done.. but what is an acceptable solution? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

sent from a phone > On 11 Oct 2022, at 11:39, Illia Marchenko wrote: > > Of course. Hierarchical tagging. leisure = pitch & sport = *. or leisure=swimming_pool, track, golf_course, fitness_centre, sports_centre, climbing, mtb routes, landuse=recreation_ground, piste=* etc The situation

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

вт, 11 окт. 2022 г., 11:48 Martin Koppenhoefer : > On the other hand, if you are looking for places to do sports, it is not > sufficient to look at leisure=pitch if you want to find all of them. > Of course. Hierarchical tagging. leisure = pitch & sport = *. >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

Am Mo., 10. Okt. 2022 um 17:33 Uhr schrieb Illia Marchenko < illiamarchenk...@gmail.com>: > Unification of tags allows more simple usage source data, e.g leisure = > pitch allows rendering of all pitches, but lots of tags as > leisure=tennis_court, leisure = baseball_playground, leisure = >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 at 01:15, Marc_marc wrote: > > Standardization is a good thing for quality but it is often a difficult > exercise, especially when the previous tags mix several pieces of > information into one, as is the case here > Especially when you consider that we now have at least 7

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

Unification of tags allows more simple usage source data, e.g leisure = pitch allows rendering of all pitches, but lots of tags as leisure=tennis_court, leisure = baseball_playground, leisure = football_ground is more difficult to use. пн, 10 окт. 2022 г., 18:15 Marc_marc : > Le 09.10.22 à

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

Le 09.10.22 à 09:37, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : Why do people have to “deprecate” other people’s tags when they introduce new ones with different semantics? to avoid 42 schemas https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/standards.png Standardization is a good thing for quality but it is often a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

Oct 10, 2022, 11:57 by illiamarchenk...@gmail.com: > > > вс, 9 окт. 2022 г., 9:50 Warin <> 61sundow...@gmail.com> >: > >> On 8/10/22 20:49, Illia Marchenko wrote: >> > Water outlets for public or customer use (generic tagging). >> > >> >>

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

вс, 9 окт. 2022 г., 9:50 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > On 8/10/22 20:49, Illia Marchenko wrote: > > Water outlets for public or customer use (generic tagging). > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Water_outlet > > Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

I'll be voting no. Me too, I feel there are way too many changes. I'd rather better define the values of fountain=*. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

On Oct 9, 2022, at 2:10 AM, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > Oct 9, 2022, 10:53 by stevea...@softworkers.com: > There is also the more “rogue” (not well-sanctioned, rather “under the > radar,” maybe looked at by some or many as “disapproved” or “questionable…”) > method of simply “any

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

Oct 9, 2022, 10:53 by stevea...@softworkers.com: > There is also the more “rogue” (not well-sanctioned, rather “under the > radar,” maybe looked at by some or many as “disapproved” or “questionable…”) > method of simply “any tag you like, and using it in the wild” (without the > whole

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

My sincere apologies for any double-post you might have received from me just now. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

I withdrew this proposal. Thanks for your feedback! ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

Creating a new tag for an as-yet-unmapped feature (key) with variants (differing values): no harder than making a formal Proposal (some effort, not terribly difficult) and getting a super-majority to Approve. Do-able, “some effort,” not trivial, but not impossible, either. I’ll say “about

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

Creating a new tag for an as-yet-unmapped feature (key) with variants (differing values): no harder than making a formal Proposal (some effort, not terribly difficult) and getting a super-majority to Approve. Do-able, “some effort,” not trivial, but not impossible, either. I’ll say “about

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

On 9/10/22 18:37, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 9 Oct 2022, at 08:50, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: I'll be voting no. me too, it is trying to deprecate a handful of tags I am using for fountain classification. Why do people have to “deprecate” other people’s

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

sent from a phone > On 9 Oct 2022, at 08:50, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'll be voting no. me too, it is trying to deprecate a handful of tags I am using for fountain classification. Why do people have to “deprecate” other people’s tags when they introduce new ones with

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

The symbol is of a tap, not applicable to a 'drinking fountain'. A suitable symbol could be a simple drop of water as that does not signify the physical feature? The tag does not distinguish between taps, drinking fountains, a continuous flow from a pipe, a river, a pool, a gutter or a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

This proposal is response to long discussion about deprecation of man_made=drinking_fountain. This is unrelated to other proposals, either my own or resubmitted. сб, 8 окт. 2022 г., 14:05 Marc_marc : > Le 08.10.22 à 11:49, Illia Marchenko a écrit : > > Water outlets for public or customer use

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

Le 08.10.22 à 11:49, Illia Marchenko a écrit : Water outlets for public or customer use (generic tagging). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Water_outlet I am afraid that

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet

Water outlets for public or customer use (generic tagging). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Water_outlet Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org