Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-29 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote: The only other tag that would work is amenity=fitness_centre. Taginfo would indicate that amenity is the most used. Taginfo results leisure=fitness_centre (and other spelling variations) = 452

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-29 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 29.12.2014 04:51, Bryan Housel wrote: Yes, `amenity` please. A gym is something people want to know about when traveling, just as much as other tourist stuff, food, lodging, etc. Then you should advocate tourism=fitness_centre. I prefer the leisure key, because fitness is something you do

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-29 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 29.12.2014 04:25, Clifford Snow wrote: Sport isn't a physical tag, where a baseball field is. I think the same applies to fitness centers. You can survey a fitness center. Not a sport. As a kid, I played baseball in a vacant lot. I agree that sport=* cannot be used on its own. It is an

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-29 Thread Janko Mihelić
2014-12-28 23:35 GMT+01:00 Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de: fitness_centre:access=membership, fitness_centre:access=club? private? Or have something like fitness_centre=yes? (Not sure as we already have sport=*) Why complicate things? I think a simple access=private (or maybe

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-29 Thread Bryan Housel
What’s leisure time? It’s 5:30am here and I’m about to head to the gym, like I do most days. On Dec 29, 2014, at 3:29 AM, Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at wrote: On 29.12.2014 04:51, Bryan Housel wrote: Yes, `amenity` please. A gym is something people want to know about when traveling,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-29 Thread Andreas Goss
fitness_centre:access=__membership, fitness_centre:access=club? private? Or have something like fitness_centre=yes? (Not sure as we already have sport=*) Why complicate things? I think a simple access=private (or maybe access=membership) should be enough. Thought about that, too.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-29 Thread Andreas Goss
What’s leisure time? It’s 5:30am here and I’m about to head to the gym, like I do most days. The leisure tag is for places people go in their spare time. So I'd say that's exactly what you are doing. You are not at work or on holidays. You could just as much edit OpenStreetMap or pursue any

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 27.12.2014 16:20, Andreas Goss wrote: What's wrong with sport=fitness and leisure=sports_centre? Persoanlly I think it would result in all kind of facilities being tagged like this, even though it's not the primary purpose. For example someone posted a User Diary entry about rowing clubs

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Andreas Goss
I like the idea of tagging the clubs's entire property as leisure=sports_centre + sport=rowing, and additionally sport=fitness (or sport=gymnastics) to the building or room dedicated to that. But I wouldn't tag it as a leisure=sports_centre on its own. It is only part of the surrounding

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Clifford Snow
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote: That's fine for a stuation like that, but do want to join a rowing club when you just moved to a city and a looking for a fitness centre to work out? Because that's my issue when having leisure=sports_centre +

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Andreas Goss
Because that's my issue when having leisure=sports_centre + sport=rowing as tag for your usual commercial gym. Oops. I mean sport=fitness (So a rowing club would be fine with leisure=sports_centre + sport=rowing,fitness) __ openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Clifford Snow
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote: Because that's my issue when having leisure=sports_centre + sport=rowing as tag for your usual commercial gym. Oops. I mean sport=fitness (So a rowing club would be fine with leisure=sports_centre +

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Andreas Goss
Water fountains, benches, parking, etc. aren't tagged any different just because they are located inside a sports centre. But are people searching for that the same way? If I look for stuff like that I'm probably somewhere outside and just look what's near me. Then I probaby realize pretty

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Clifford Snow
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote: ess_centre:access=membership, fitness_centre:access=club? private? Or have something like fitness_centre=yes? (Not sure as we already have sport=*) Honestly didn't think that much about this, because I just wanted a tag

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Bryan Housel
Yes, `amenity` please. A gym is something people want to know about when traveling, just as much as other tourist stuff, food, lodging, etc. On Dec 28, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote: The only other tag that would work is amenity=fitness_centre. Taginfo

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-27 Thread Andreas Goss
From the German Forum... just wanted to mention this here, too. http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=29190 What's wrong with sport=fitness and leisure=sports_centre? Persoanlly I think it would result in all kind of facilities being tagged like this, even though it's not the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-26 Thread Andreas Goss
I wonder how we can tag fitness center attributes, such as pool, steam, sauna/ etc. They very all over the place. Being able do documenting features would allow health clubs sites to be included. I would see this as a 2nd step, for the start I would really just like to be able to tag this in

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-25 Thread Andreas Goss
Just had the great idea to suggest tagging gyms/fintess centres for the German a weekly task (new year's resolutions incoming), when I realized we still don't have tagging schema for it. After I failed to address the issues with leisure=gym in my last proposal (ambiguity of the word gym) and

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-25 Thread Matthijs Melissen
On 25 December 2014 at 14:21, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote: Just had the great idea to suggest tagging gyms/fintess centres for the German a weekly task (new year's resolutions incoming), when I realized we still don't have tagging schema for it. Thanks for addressing this. Fitness

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-25 Thread Tom Pfeifer
Matthijs Melissen wrote on 2014-12-25 22:35: On 25 December 2014 at 14:21, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote: Just had the great idea to suggest tagging gyms/fintess centres for the German a weekly task (new year's resolutions incoming), when I realized we still don't have tagging schema

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-25 Thread Clifford Snow
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote: Just had the great idea to suggest tagging gyms/fintess centres for the German a weekly task (new year's resolutions incoming), when I realized we still don't have tagging schema for it. After I failed to address the