Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - toll

sent from a phone > On 8. May 2019, at 19:07, wiki_openstreetmap_org.5.k...@spamgourmet.com wrote: > > In my opinion the mailing list is everything but well-aranged, has no easy to > use layout, no logic line-up of comments, etc. Because I HAVE to drop one, > I'll drop the mailing list. I c

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - toll

On 09/05/19 03:22, Paul Allen wrote: On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 18:08, > wrote: I have seen that some people already started to reply to this main. AGAIN: Mails here will not be processed (by me)!! You have pretty much guaranteed that t

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - toll

On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 19:22, marc marc wrote: > . > osm is a community project, the social is not to be neglected. that > being said, everyone has read that you will ignore them here, maybe the > proposal would deserve to be led by someone who has more time to read > people's opinions on both mai

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - toll

Le 08.05.19 à 20:05, wiki_openstreetmap_org.5.k...@spamgourmet.com a écrit : > As said please quote in an usefull way :) you could say the same thing with a little more consideration, such as "I don't have time to read the mailing list regularly because my PERSONAL preference is the wiki, do no

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - toll

You have pretty much guaranteed that those who find it easier to respond here will vote against your proposal because it ignored their suggestions. There are probably some here who will vote against your proposal even if they agree with it 100% because of your attitude. I'm not attempting to di

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - toll

On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 18:08, wrote: > I have seen that some people already started to reply to this main. > > AGAIN: Mails here will not be processed (by me)!! > You have pretty much guaranteed that those who find it easier to respond here will vote against your proposal because it ignored their

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - toll

On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 17:34, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> > NOTE: All comments attached to this mail WILL NOT BE PROCESSED! >> > Only comments on the wiki page will be answered and worked on! >> You do realise that the wiki is supposed to document current best >> practice, and can not dictate i

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - toll

On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 17:26, marc marc wrote: > > Le 08.05.19 à 18:00, Andy Mabbett a écrit : > > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 14:50, > > wrote: > >> > >> I > > > > Who is "I"? is "wiki_openstreetmap_org.5.kuru" really your name? > the author of the wiki page :TBKMrt If the OP wishes to be known (only

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - toll

I have seen that some people already started to reply to this main.   AGAIN: Mails here will not be processed (by me)!!   It's not about dictating something or cutting people off, but about my lack of time to maintain the wiki and the mailing list. In my opinion the mailing list is everything

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - toll

Am Mi., 8. Mai 2019 um 18:02 Uhr schrieb Andy Mabbett < a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk>: > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 14:50, > wrote: > > > > I > > Who is "I"? is "wiki_openstreetmap_org.5.kuru" really your name? > There is no requirement to tell your name in order to contribute to a discussion here. I a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - toll

Le 08.05.19 à 18:00, Andy Mabbett a écrit : > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 14:50, > wrote: >> >> I > > Who is "I"? is "wiki_openstreetmap_org.5.kuru" really your name? spamgourmet is anti-spam feature that allow you to add keyword prefix. you can deduce that the account is kuru (but there is nothing t

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - toll

On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 14:50, wrote: > > I Who is "I"? is "wiki_openstreetmap_org.5.kuru" really your name? > NOTE: All comments attached to this mail WILL NOT BE PROCESSED! > Only comments on the wiki page will be answered and worked on! You do realise that the wiki is supposed to document cur

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - toll

Le 08.05.19 à 15:50, wiki_openstreetmap_org.5.k...@spamgourmet.com a écrit : > I would like to hear your thoughts and comments here: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/toll - I see no need to specify that a country's roads are in that country. - I have always considered stran

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - toll

8 May 2019, 15:50 by wiki_openstreetmap_org.5.k...@spamgourmet.com: > I would like to hear your thoughts and comments here: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/toll > >   > I see no good reason to turn simple bool

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - toll

I would like to hear your thoughts and comments here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/toll    NOTE: All comments attached to this mail WILL NOT BE PROCESSED! Only comments on the wiki page will be answered and worked on! ___ Tagg

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Toll Gantry

According to the wiki, enforcement=toll is used for something completely different. See: HGV toll enforcement camera bridges and pillars in Germany (see Toll Collect on Wikipedia), checking system compliance. For normal toll bridges that directly t

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Toll Gantry

Would enforcement=toll not be enough? 05-09-2018 20:48 tarihinde Jonathon McClung yazdı: > Hello OSM Tagging List! > > We at Kaart noticed a lot of unresolved discussions on the more and > more prevalent toll gantries that never really came to a head. We > considered some of the routing issues ca

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Toll Gantry

Hello OSM Tagging List! We at Kaart noticed a lot of unresolved discussions on the more and more prevalent toll gantries that never really came to a head. We considered some of the routing issues caused by the current barrier=toll_booth method when we started to run into them with the data we c