We followed Pieren's advice on the Talk
pagehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/use_sidewayand
made the proposal
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/use_sidewaymuch
shorter. This focuses on making clear what the proposal is and not so much
on our arguments. For those that are interested in our arguments we've made
a sub
pagehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/use_sideway_arguments
including our comment on last proposal. Hope this helps.
With regard to Matthijs his question I can say that in yesterday's
newspaper (algemeen dagblad) I read that NL has 35.000 KM of cycleways.
Not sure why Matthijs qoute's the no backward compatibility to the
existing bicycle=no (in e.g. NL) . We've commented on that in the
proposal (which has moved to the subpage)
Cheers
PeeWee32
2014-03-17 0:07 GMT+01:00 Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl:
On 16 March 2014 17:34, Pee Wee piewi...@gmail.com wrote:
Last november we proposed the bicycle=use_cycleway. There was a lot of
discussion before and during voting. The voting was very close but we
decided to reject the proposal and work on a new one.
| no backward compatibility to the existing bicycle=no (in e.g. NL)
Just curious: can anyone find out how many percent of the ways with
highway=cyclepath are located in the Netherlands? It seems Tagwatch
doesn't exist anymore, so I don't really know how to get these data.
-- Matthijs
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
--
Verbeter de wereld. Word mapper voor Openstreetmaphttp://www.openstreetmap.org
.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
