Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 2)

Alberto, thanks for your effort. I've updated fire hydrant page [1]. Can you check it, and improve it, if necessary? Will check it and try to translate for the German version. Moritz ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 2))

Hi Alberto, This is a nice news :) Thank you to bring this up ! Francois 2017-11-29 22:26 GMT+01:00 Viking : > Finally the proposal [1] has been approved. > Thank you to all people who worked on this project. > As soon as possible we will update fire hydrant wiki page. > Then

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 2))

Finally the proposal [1] has been approved. Thank you to all people who worked on this project. As soon as possible we will update fire hydrant wiki page. Then we can go on with part 3... :) [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant_Extensions_(part_2) Best regards

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 2))

After many revisions to fire hydrant proposal, I request you to vote the new version of this proposal [1]. [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant_Extensions_(part_2) Thanks a lot for your effort Alberto. There is already a map which implements the scheme: User

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 2))

After many revisions to fire hydrant proposal, I request you to vote the new version of this proposal [1]. [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant_Extensions_(part_2) Thank you Best regards Alberto --- Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions)

No, I didn't concact them individually yet. Moritz, can you do it?\ Will do. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions) (Moritz)

The new proposal sounds reasonable for me. Have you already contacted anybody who opposed the previous proposal? I'm still thinking it would make sense to ask them individually but don't want to annoy them by to much contact requests. Moritz ___

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions)

Me too. Can anyone check if the proposal [1] is consistent and error-free? Feel free to add better descriptions. I will read over it on the weekend. And then can we go directly to vote it, or have we to call a RFC again? I would start a (possible shorter) RFC again and explicitly ask the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions)

Thanks for the effort you put in this proposal and splitting it again. Regarding your last question how to proceed: I would aim for the proposals to get approved (even if it only means that there are some people on the tagging list how voted for it and it is not related to all the other

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions)

I've tried to summarize post-vote conclusions here: Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 2) [1] Now, we can use it as it is and apply these changes to hydrant wiki page, or change it, or vote it again. Then we can go on and discuss/vote Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 3) [2]. Finally, if we want, we can

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions)

On 17-Oct-17 10:00 AM, Dave Swarthout wrote: Martin wrote: "You don't have to wait, you can use new tags whenever you want. Just removing existing tags is complicated, adding new ones isn't. *)" +1 +1 - Indeed it is best to map a few of the new things so as to see how it goes for you. The

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions)

Martin wrote: "You don't have to wait, you can use new tags whenever you want. Just removing existing tags is complicated, adding new ones isn't. *)" +1 The entire voting process is non-binding. It's a referendum of the opinions of the few people who read this list, take the trouble to analyze a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions)

Hi Alberto, Am 16.10.2017 um 19:28 schrieb Viking: > Voting ended with 21 "no" and 28 "yes", and at least one that would change > "no" to "yes" if we redefine gallons. > Now we have to do decide what to do. Is this enough to delcare it approved? A quote from the wiki (page

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions)

Voting ended with 21 "no" and 28 "yes", and at least one that would change "no" to "yes" if we redefine gallons. Now we have to do decide what to do. Is this enough to delcare it approved? Anyway some issues can be easily solved: fire_hydrant:class=* can become fire_hydrant:awwa_class=* gpm can

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions)

> Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 11:14:56 + > From: marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> > To: "tagging@openstreetmap.org" <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant > Extensions) > > Hello, > &

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions)

Hello, Le 05. 10. 17 à 12:16, Viking a écrit : > I really don't understand why so many people oppose this proposal [1] without > ever having participated in the discussions it is indeed strange that no opponent took the time to say during the RFC arguments that are found now during the vote.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions)

On 05-Oct-17 09:16 PM, Viking wrote: I really don't understand why so many people oppose this proposal [1] without ever having participated in the discussions that lasted for months. We did many efforts to reach this compromise that seems a good solution for firefighters' needs, and now people

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions)

I really don't understand why so many people oppose this proposal [1] without ever having participated in the discussions that lasted for months. We did many efforts to reach this compromise that seems a good solution for firefighters' needs, and now people are opposing to it whithout

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions)

I've fixed page layout without changing anything in the proposal. I request you to vote this proposal [1]. [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant_Extensions Thank you Best regards Alberto --- Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast