sent from a phone
> On 22. Aug 2020, at 13:06, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Would that be acceptable?
words are better IMHO, easier to remember and faster to type...
Cheers Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
ht
On 22/8/20 12:56 am, Supaplex wrote:
I see that I have probably chosen an unfavorable solution to solve the
problem described. Many seem to accept the basic problem: There is
only one qualitative category for all kerbs with a height of over ~3
cm, although in reality there is a significant di
I see that I have probably chosen an unfavorable solution to solve the
problem described. Many seem to accept the basic problem: There is only
one qualitative category for all kerbs with a height of over ~3 cm,
although in reality there is a significant difference.
I see two alternatives to the pr
Nederland: stoeprand (/stooprund/); officially: trottoirband
(/trotwharbund/)
I wonder what it is in Burundi and Iceland.
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op vr 21 aug. 2020 om 09:39 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 21. Aug 2020, at 03:34, 80hnhtv4ago
sent from a phone
> On 21. Aug 2020, at 03:34, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> in the united states it is Curb.
in Germany it is Bordstein
Cheers Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/
>in the united states it is Curb.
>
>
>>Thursday, August 20, 2020 6:20 PM -05:00 from Martin Koppenhoefer <
>>dieterdre...@gmail.com >:
>>
>>
>>
>>sent from a phone
>>
>>> On 21. Aug 2020, at 01:05, Clifford Snow < cliff...@snowandsnow.us > wrote:
>>>
>>> Martin - does that suggest that over 1
sent from a phone
> On 21. Aug 2020, at 01:05, Clifford Snow wrote:
>
> Martin - does that suggest that over 12,000 existing raised kerbs will need
> to be resurveyed?
that’s how I read it, and there are actually 28.4K raised kerbs affected
(because you have to look at the ways as well).
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 2:33 PM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> Worth mentioning that the proposal intends to redefine the tag kerb=raised
> , true?
>
Martin - does that suggest that over 12,000 existing raised kerbs will need
to be resurveyed? I've done hundreds of raised curbs in my county. While
Worth mentioning that the proposal intends to redefine the tag kerb=raised ,
true?
Cheers Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Voting is now open for the tag kerb=regular:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/kerb%3Dregular
I intend to add the tag /kerb=regular/ to explicitly distinguish
kerbs/curbs with "normal" standard height from /kerb=raised/ to solve a
lack of clarity in the differentiation between
10 matches
Mail list logo