On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 01:31, Alessandro Sarretta
wrote:
>
> And in case on the left we have a shared cycle/foot lane?
>
> cycleway:left=lane
> pedestrian_lane=left
> segregated=no
>
> or
>
> cycleway:left=lane
> footway:left=lane
> segregated=no
>
> I think discussing of specific examples could he
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 13:06, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 9:36 PM Markus wrote:
> >
> > In my opinion, footway[:left/right]=lane isn't a good idea for the
> > following reasons: 1. footway=lane is a contradiction, as a lane (part
> > of a road/path) isn't a footway (separate path)
sent from a phone
> On 5. Dec 2019, at 07:17, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> But we are not mapping the users of the lane, we are trying to map the
> construction, not?
> The construction is some paint on a surface that would be used by cars
> if there was no paint.
no, we are not just mapping the ph
But we are not mapping the users of the lane, we are trying to map the
construction, not?
The construction is some paint on a surface that would be used by cars
if there was no paint.
Since the "construction" is the same for pedestrian lanes and cycle
lanes, I thought that having a similar tagging
Am Mi., 4. Dez. 2019 um 13:06 Uhr schrieb Marc Gemis :
> I would love to see consistency between cycleway and footway mapping.
IMHO these are quite different, bicycles are generally considered vehicles
by the law and pedestrians are not. It doesn't seem to make sense to have
"consistency" here,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 9:36 PM Markus wrote:
>
> In my opinion, footway[:left/right]=lane isn't a good idea for the
> following reasons: 1. footway=lane is a contradiction, as a lane (part
> of a road/path) isn't a footway (separate path).
But isn't this exactly the same as we do for cycleway=lan
Thank you Markus for this summary.
I think that the issue of having a good way to describe marked lanes on
the road dedicated for people to walk is still there. In my opinion it
needs a more extensive discussion and some tagging and graphic examples
to show simple and complex application.
As
Dear all,
The voting on the proposal for a new key pedestrian_lane=* for lanes
designated for pedestrians is over. 8 people voted for the proposal, 5
against it and 1 person abstained. This is an approval by 62%, which
is below the required 75% majority. Therefore the proposal has been
rejected.
