Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

education=sports for academically oriented sports schools, education=cram_school otherwise. education=driving also for boat, train and aero driving schools. Advanced levels of those non-road driving schools(e.g. ADR training, multi-engine plane driving) go to education=specialty. 2017-09-18 0:22

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

Thanks for clarification re "types" of training schools. Carrying on along the driving side of things but diverging a bit - how about flying & boating training schools? It was mentioned that for driver training, the school only teaches the student how to drive, then they must go to the Transport

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

sent from a phone > On 17. Sep 2017, at 10:52, Tobias Knerr wrote: > > . If we were to reform > the tagging system, my ideal solution would be a "type"/"thing"/"class" > key that is used for the main tag of all features. the downside with this approach is that many

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

Hi Erkin, Am 17.09.2017 um 07:54 schrieb Erkin Alp Güney: > Two RFCs by me are ready. One of them are education reform(actually > delayed a bit). This brings education key instead of amenity=school. > Full proposal at >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

I would suggest there needs to be a separation between the school as an organisation, a campus, a building, and the courses provided. Here in NL there are many mixed colleges, which provide statutory education to kids (16+), adult academic education and vocational training. Such colleges often

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

These are applied educational research centers and should be tagged "education=applied_education". Completely different from a cram school. I do not know of any jurisdiction where a driving school is entitled to license a driver by itself. These examinations are government regulated otherwise

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

I have partly inspired by Turkish standardized education institution identification guide. Most of the school kinds mentioned, except universities, including ministry itself has distinct color codes identifying what kind of education institution they are (for example, all secondary schools have to

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

Thanks for your response, Erkin. The idea of putting driving license and some speciality schools under "cram" schools came from the fact that, despite of needind a special license, in my country (Spain) these centers do not make exams, they only prepare for an official exam done by the government.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

On 17.09.2017 07:54, Erkin Alp Güney wrote: > This brings education key instead of amenity=school. In my opinion, and speaking broadly, the job of the OSM tagging system is to answer two questions: - What kind of feature is this? - What properties does this feature have? The first question can

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

That was a leftover from previous proposal. Edited proposal page to reflect that all educational institutions are covered. 17-09-2017 09:26 tarihinde marc marc yazdı: > Le 17. 09. 17 à 07:54, Erkin Alp Güney a écrit : > >>

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

They go under education=specialty. education=vocational is intended for post-secondary vocational schools. Regarding other question, yes, you can tag specialty=* or vocation=* to denote which subjects are trained, however, I do not think OSM database can cope with a generic university's whole

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

Looks good Erkin Question, thanks. We have Security Training "schools" (companies to train private security guards) & also Language Schools (usually to teach English to non-English speakers). Would these come under =speciality, or possibly =vocational? Would it be possibly be an idea to also

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

Hi, Erick. I'm just a newbie in tagging, but I find a reason for keeping school and university at the "amenity" tag. These educative institutions are often easy to spot (they span over an entire building and in many cases they have a campus or playground), while other "education" institutions or

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

Le 17. 09. 17 à 07:54, Erkin Alp Güney a écrit : > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_Features/Education_Reform_Alternative +1 for good inventory work

[Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

Two RFCs by me are ready. One of them are education reform(actually delayed a bit). This brings education key instead of amenity=school. Full proposal at Another is magnetic levitation trains, this