Re: [Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging
shoulder:motor_vehicle=* feels better. But you are not allowed to walk on the shoulder anyway, so actually something like shoulder:access=breakdown would be a better start. --colin On 2016-01-30 12:31, Warin wrote: > On 30/01/2016 9:54 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > >> motor_vehicle:shoulder=* ?? > > motor vehicles around here don't have shoulders. At least not that I have > noticed. > No, the shoulders that are being considered are attached to highways... > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Andy Mabbett> wrote: > On 29 January 2016 at 13:14, Richard Fairhurst wrote: >> >> Thanks to everyone who contributed. >> >> I've accordingly formalised the page and moved it to >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shoulder . > > Thanks. > > What about the case (such as "managed motorways", in the UK) where a > shoulder is reserved for emergency use, except in certain periods, > where it may be used by normal traffic? access tags? There is also the mention of shoulder:psv=yes .. what is the difference to a psv lane? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging
On 30/01/2016 9:54 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: motor_vehicle:shoulder=* ?? motor vehicles around here don't have shoulders. At least not that I have noticed. No, the shoulders that are being considered are attached to highways... On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Andy Mabbett> wrote: On 29 January 2016 at 13:14, Richard Fairhurst > wrote: > > Thanks to everyone who contributed. > > I've accordingly formalised the page and moved it to > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shoulder . Thanks. What about the case (such as "managed motorways", in the UK) where a shoulder is reserved for emergency use, except in certain periods, where it may be used by normal traffic? access tags? There is also the mention of shoulder:psv=yes .. what is the difference to a psv lane? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging
On 30 January 2016 at 13:11, Colin Smalewrote: > shoulder:motor_vehicle=* feels better. But you are not allowed to walk on > the shoulder anyway, so actually something like shoulder:access=breakdown > would be a better start. My question was about shoulders which are for emergency use only; except during (variable) peak periods, when any vehicle may use them for regular driving. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging
motor_vehicle:shoulder=* ?? On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Andy Mabbettwrote: > On 29 January 2016 at 13:14, Richard Fairhurst > wrote: > > > > Thanks to everyone who contributed. > > > > I've accordingly formalised the page and moved it to > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shoulder . > > Thanks. > > What about the case (such as "managed motorways", in the UK) where a > shoulder is reserved for emergency use, except in certain periods, > where it may be used by normal traffic? > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging
On 29 January 2016 at 13:14, Richard Fairhurstwrote: > > Thanks to everyone who contributed. > > I've accordingly formalised the page and moved it to > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shoulder . Thanks. What about the case (such as "managed motorways", in the UK) where a shoulder is reserved for emergency use, except in certain periods, where it may be used by normal traffic? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging
dieterdreist wrote: > yes, Standstreifen, Standspur, Seitenstreifen, Randstreifen. I've > improved the proposal to make this clearer for non-native people > (added a definition (from WP), added more German synonyms, > images) Thanks to everyone who contributed. I've accordingly formalised the page and moved it to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shoulder . cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Formalising-shoulder-tagging-tp5865799p5866229.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging
Thanks, that helps a lot:-) Von: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Januar 2016 11:22 An: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging 2016-01-26 10:59 GMT+01:00 Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>>: Dou you think that shoulder means what we call "Seitenstreifen" ? yes, Standstreifen, Standspur, Seitenstreifen, Randstreifen. I've improved the proposal to make this clearer for non-native people (added a definition (from WP), added more German synonyms, images) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging
Hi, As a German I am not sure if I understand what shoulder means. In Germany we have a traffic_sign "Seitenstreifen nicht befahrbar" and one with a pictogram: http://images.google.de/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wolkdirekt.com%2Fimages%2F600%2F536052%2Fverkehrsschild-nach-stvo-typ-1-nr-388-seitenstreifen-f-mehrspurige-fahrzeuge-nicht-befahrbar.jpg=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wolkdirekt.com%2Fverkehrsschilder.html=600=600=_olMoMJf-q2L2M%3A=DQxsHaya53Mr-M=10KnVt7BLsW6UaeYrIgL=isch=rc=3=385=1=0=49=0ahUKEwieicOdm8fKAhVFXRQKHScMC7EQrQMIHjAA Dou you think that shoulder means what we call "Seitenstreifen" ? Gerd Von: Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Januar 2016 10:23 An: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Betreff: [Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging Hi all, At present there is no documented standard for tagging highway shoulders. We have http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shoulder with shoulder=yes|no, which has been in 'draft (under way)' since 2010. In Australia, cycleway=shoulder appears also to be used. Taginfo stats are: shoulder = *7120, of which: shoulder = no 3230 shoulder = yes 2743 shoulder = right964 shoulder:width = * 1794 shoulder:right = * 1047 width:shoulder = * 843 cycleway = shoulder 502 There are several gazillion miles (approximate value) of roads with shoulders around the world. We should have a way to tag them. I'd therefore suggest simply formalising the most popular existing usage and the one on the wiki page - that is, shoulder=yes|no. As a default, I'd suggest shoulder=yes is presumed as the most common real-world situation, i.e.: "A paved shoulder, wide enough to be used as an emergency refuge for cars, and for through passage by bicycles." (Narrow shoulders can of course be tagged with shoulder:width, gravel ones by shoulder:surface, and so on.) There are of course many refinements one could imagine, for peak-hour shoulder running, buses, etc. But since "the perfect is the enemy of the good" etc., I'd like to get the basic shoulder=yes|no agreed first. Speak now or forever hold your peace! cheers Richard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging
On 26/01/2016 8:59 PM, Gerd Petermann wrote: Hi, As a German I am not sure if I understand what shoulder means. In Germany we have a traffic_sign "Seitenstreifen nicht befahrbar" and one with a pictogram: http://images.google.de/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wolkdirekt.com%2Fimages%2F600%2F536052%2Fverkehrsschild-nach-stvo-typ-1-nr-388-seitenstreifen-f-mehrspurige-fahrzeuge-nicht-befahrbar.jpg=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wolkdirekt.com%2Fverkehrsschilder.html=600=600=_olMoMJf-q2L2M%3A=DQxsHaya53Mr-M=10KnVt7BLsW6UaeYrIgL=isch=rc=3=385=1=0=49=0ahUKEwieicOdm8fKAhVFXRQKHScMC7EQrQMIHjAA Dou you think that shoulder means what we call "Seitenstreifen" ? auto translation of 'Seitenstreifen' = 'hard shoulder' So .. yes .. but 'shoulder' would also include 'soft' as well as 'hard'. So, for example, grass can be included. There would be no sharp 'gutter' between the road and shoulder .. a spoon drain (a shallow trench with smooth side) would be allowed - the movement of a vehicle from the road to the shoulder should be easy and safe. Gerd Von: Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Januar 2016 10:23 An: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Betreff: [Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging Hi all, At present there is no documented standard for tagging highway shoulders. We have http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shoulder with shoulder=yes|no, which has been in 'draft (under way)' since 2010. In Australia, cycleway=shoulder appears also to be used. Taginfo stats are: shoulder = *7120, of which: shoulder = no 3230 shoulder = yes 2743 shoulder = right964 shoulder:width = * 1794 shoulder:right = * 1047 width:shoulder = * 843 cycleway = shoulder 502 There are several gazillion miles (approximate value) of roads with shoulders around the world. We should have a way to tag them. I'd therefore suggest simply formalising the most popular existing usage and the one on the wiki page - that is, shoulder=yes|no. As a default, I'd suggest shoulder=yes is presumed as the most common real-world situation, i.e.: "A paved shoulder, wide enough to be used as an emergency refuge for cars, and for through passage by bicycles." (Narrow shoulders can of course be tagged with shoulder:width, gravel ones by shoulder:surface, and so on.) There are of course many refinements one could imagine, for peak-hour shoulder running, buses, etc. But since "the perfect is the enemy of the good" etc., I'd like to get the basic shoulder=yes|no agreed first. Speak now or forever hold your peace! cheers Richard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging
On 26 January 2016 at 10:15, Paul Johnsonwrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Gerd Petermann > wrote: >> >> Seitenstreifen > > Yes, that would be what we're referring to, if Google Translate is to be > believed. If only there was a free online encyclopedia... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder_%28road%29 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stra%C3%9Fenquerschnitt#Seitenstreifen -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging
Hi all, At present there is no documented standard for tagging highway shoulders. We have http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shoulder with shoulder=yes|no, which has been in 'draft (under way)' since 2010. In Australia, cycleway=shoulder appears also to be used. Taginfo stats are: shoulder = *7120, of which: shoulder = no 3230 shoulder = yes 2743 shoulder = right964 shoulder:width = * 1794 shoulder:right = * 1047 width:shoulder = * 843 cycleway = shoulder 502 There are several gazillion miles (approximate value) of roads with shoulders around the world. We should have a way to tag them. I'd therefore suggest simply formalising the most popular existing usage and the one on the wiki page - that is, shoulder=yes|no. As a default, I'd suggest shoulder=yes is presumed as the most common real-world situation, i.e.: "A paved shoulder, wide enough to be used as an emergency refuge for cars, and for through passage by bicycles." (Narrow shoulders can of course be tagged with shoulder:width, gravel ones by shoulder:surface, and so on.) There are of course many refinements one could imagine, for peak-hour shoulder running, buses, etc. But since "the perfect is the enemy of the good" etc., I'd like to get the basic shoulder=yes|no agreed first. Speak now or forever hold your peace! cheers Richard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging
2016-01-26 10:59 GMT+01:00 Gerd Petermann: > Dou you think that shoulder means what we call "Seitenstreifen" ? yes, Standstreifen, Standspur, Seitenstreifen, Randstreifen. I've improved the proposal to make this clearer for non-native people (added a definition (from WP), added more German synonyms, images) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Formalising shoulder tagging
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Gerd Petermann < gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Seitenstreifen Yes, that would be what we're referring to, if Google Translate is to be believed. http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/84rYvy_hxh95K8ipF1NfVw/photo has an example of an expressway with both a left and right shoulder. The left shoulder is left of the orange/yellow line to the Type K rail in the central reservation, and the right shoulder runs from the solid white line right to the Type T31 rail protecting the bridge pier abutting the outer edge of the roadway. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging