sent from a phone
> Il giorno 21 lug 2016, alle ore 03:56, Kevin Kenny
> ha scritto:
>
> What's the process for modifying the 'accepted'
> set of values? (I presume that simply wikifying it would be regarded as
> vandalism.)
you can either make a formal proposal or modify the wiki page, pr
We have a somewhat similar problem in Belgium: a lot of historical paths
are by law open to everyone, however they are private property. So the road
is private, but the access is not. It would then not make sense to put an
access=private tag, as the owner has no right to allow or restrict access.
H
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Richard Fairhurst
wrote:
> Yep. I asked a similar question at
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-February/028504.html
> but there was no particular consensus.
>
> access=permit seems to have moderate usage (slightly more than =license,
> whic
Kevin Kenny wrote:
> I just want to be able to look at my map and answer the
> quick question, "is there red tape that I have to plan for
> before I plan a trip here?"
Yep. I asked a similar question at
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-February/028504.html
but there was no
Oops, accidentally sent this from the wrong mailbox again.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Also, we aren't being consistent with such a strict definition. There
> are many shopping malls near me, and the ways have no access tags.
> That's wrong, as they aren't public rig
Oops - sent this message from the wrong mailbox and it either bounced or
got flagged for moderation.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kevin Kenny
Date: Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Tagging] How to tag: public lands that are accessed by permit?
To: "Tag discussion, strate
