Re: [Tagging] Hill figures

2019-09-05 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 16:51, Volker Schmidt wrote: > The one I quoted seems to be considerably older: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uffington_White_Horse > That one is, yes, & Martin's historic tag would definitely apply there, but (all?) the ones in the OP date from ~1700s onwards with two

Re: [Tagging] Hill figures

2019-09-05 Thread Volker Schmidt
The one I quoted seems to be considerably older: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uffington_White_Horse On Wed, 4 Sep 2019, 23:47 Graeme Fitzpatrick, wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 18:54, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > >> It could make sense in this context to mention the tag >>

Re: [Tagging] Hill figures

2019-09-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 4. Sep 2019, at 23:45, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > But would that really apply to these, as most of them only range in age from > <100 to 200-300 years old? as long as you find a suitable value ;-) In general the civilization tags aim more at older sites while for

Re: [Tagging] Hill figures

2019-09-04 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 18:54, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > It could make sense in this context to mention the tag > historic:civilization > which is about the culture that created a feature. > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic:civilization > But would that really apply to these,

[Tagging] Hill Figures

2019-09-04 Thread Peter Neale via Tagging
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 10:14:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Mateusz Konieczny To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"     Cc: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"     Subject: Re: [Tagging] Hill figures Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="

Re: [Tagging] Hill figures

2019-09-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
It could make sense in this context to mention the tag historic:civilization which is about the culture that created a feature. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic:civilization Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Hill figures

2019-09-04 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
4 Sep 2019, 09:42 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 4. Sep 2019, at 09:08, Volker Schmidt wrote: >> >> man_made=geoglyph (usage >700 in taginfo) >> Seems to be a reasonable tagging >> > > > +1 > +1, I added it to some of linked example that were missing it

Re: [Tagging] Hill figures

2019-09-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 4. Sep 2019, at 09:08, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > man_made=geoglyph (usage >700 in taginfo) > Seems to be a reasonable tagging +1 Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Hill figures

2019-09-04 Thread Volker Schmidt
The Uffington White Horse https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1618450 is mapped as man_made=geoglyph (usage >700 in taginfo) Seems to be a reasonable tagging Virus-free. www.avast.com

Re: [Tagging] Hill figures

2019-09-03 Thread Warin
Not all of them are on hills. Marree Man https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marree_Man Possibly artwork=geoglyph ??? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoglyph** * * On 4/9/19 8:49 am, Andy Mabbett wrote: In the UK, hill figures include: * The Cerne Abbas Giant [1], [2], [3] * The Fovant badges

[Tagging] Hill figures

2019-09-03 Thread Andy Mabbett
In the UK, hill figures include: * The Cerne Abbas Giant [1], [2], [3] * The Fovant badges [4], [5], [6] * RNLI Dunkirk Memorial at Margate [7], [8] * Osmington White Horse [9], [10], [11]] and others exist elsewhere [12]. As can be seen from my examples, these usually significant landmarks are