Re: [Tagging] How to tag a public works facility ?
2014-02-22 13:49 GMT+01:00 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com: So I guess the final say is how this is handled by the tools that use the . If they can handle stuff like this with ease, then I see no reason to duplicate a way just to add a fence, or making it over complicated by letting two ways share nodes or a multipolygon from multipleways.. I see this not as a case for tools to handle something, but as a question how to model in a clear way. If you now add height=2m to this object, you might still be able to say, this is for the fence by interpreting it, but adding other tags like wikipedia or name it will become often unclear to which object the attributes / tags belong, if several different objects are represented in the same osm object. If we had a distinct area datatype this would be more obvious (and less a problem therefore, because people would be forced to separate objects). E.g. if your fence were a wall, it would be impossible to tell whether this was a thick wall (mapped as an area) or if the wall was intended as a linear feature. cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] How to tag a public works facility ?
2014-02-19 22:18 GMT+01:00 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com: Why use landuse=industrial? Because it's rendered? I don't advocate it to be used exclusively, but it fits the current definition (production and/or storage). cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] How to tag a public works facility ?
Hi - In the past I've seen people use landuse=depot http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Ddepot Dan 2014-02-19 9:06 GMT+00:00 Pieren pier...@gmail.com: It's a small area with several buildings where the municipality is storing vehicles and the maintenance and repair services. Someone suggests to use amenity=public_building but it's deprecated now in the wiki... building=public doesn't fit well here because it's an area and is not open to the public. Something new like amenity=public_works ? (0 in taginfo) Pieren ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] How to tag a public works facility ?
For what it is worth, in the area I live in such facilities seem to be called corporate yards. Since industrial=depot seems to have only one use at present and does not fit exactly. At least it does not fit in my mind. Perhaps it could be tagged as landuse=industrial, industrial=corporate_yard with operator=City of and maybe name=XXX Corporate Yard -Tod On Feb 19, 2014, at 3:37 AM, SomeoneElse wrote: Pieren wrote: It's a small area with several buildings where the municipality is storing vehicles and the maintenance and repair services. I've gone with landuse=industrial, industrial=depot for these in the past: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254083705 (although arguably the name on that should actually be operator) Someone suggests to use amenity=public_building but it's deprecated now in the wiki... Whoever edited the wiki clearly failed to communicate with all the editor authors since amenity=public_building is a default in P2 (not that it's relevant in this case, since what you're describing isn't just a building. Cheers, Andy ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] How to tag a public works facility ?
2014-02-19 17:32 GMT+01:00 Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com: Any reasons not to use landuse=depot? Besides the sparsity of its wiki page... http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Ddepot 428 instances in taginfo +1 But using depot:type=* instead of type=* (as I suggested in http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/RFC-Classification-for-ports-and-inland-terminals-td5792661.html) 2014-02-19 16:27 GMT+00:00 Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com: For what it is worth, in the area I live in such facilities seem to be called corporate yards. Since industrial=depot seems to have only one use at present and does not fit exactly. At least it does not fit in my mind. Perhaps it could be tagged as landuse=industrial, industrial=corporate_yard with operator=City of and maybe name=XXX Corporate Yard -Tod On Feb 19, 2014, at 3:37 AM, SomeoneElse wrote: Pieren wrote: It's a small area with several buildings where the municipality is storing vehicles and the maintenance and repair services. I've gone with landuse=industrial, industrial=depot for these in the past: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254083705 (although arguably the name on that should actually be operator) Someone suggests to use amenity=public_building but it's deprecated now in the wiki... Whoever edited the wiki clearly failed to communicate with all the editor authors since amenity=public_building is a default in P2 (not that it's relevant in this case, since what you're describing isn't just a building. Cheers, Andy ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] How to tag a public works facility ?
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:40 PM, sabas88 saba...@gmail.com wrote: Any reasons not to use landuse=depot? Besides the sparsity of its wiki page... http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Ddepot 428 instances in taginfo +1 But using depot:type=* instead of type=* (as I suggested in http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/RFC-Classification-for-ports-and-inland-terminals-td5792661.html Thanks all for you suggestions. depot is the closest for what we need although it's not only a depot for vehicles. It's also keeping various equipments required by municipalities (could be street furnitures, salting of roads, plants (winter), compost, etc). Btw, use simply depot=* instead of depot:type=*. I don't understand this recent trend to add a :type suffix in subtags. It was not the case in the past (e.g. building=*, wood=*, traffic_signals=*, etc, etc, etc) Pieren ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] How to tag a public works facility ?
2014-02-19 18:20 GMT+01:00 Pieren pier...@gmail.com: Btw, use simply depot=* instead of depot:type=*. I don't understand this recent trend to add a :type suffix in subtags. It was not the case in the past (e.g. building=*, wood=*, traffic_signals=*, etc, etc, etc) Simply because there's an overlap between the common use of type=container (as in waste container) and the type=container of the depot proposal (as in shipping container). IMO I had to clarify the tag... Pieren Regards, Stefano ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
