On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 13:14, Christoph Hormann wrote:
the whole waterway line with stepping across zoom levels is full of
> fairly strange historic artefacts and not really well thought through.
> Combined with removing minor waterways from z13 waterways are quite a
> mess now.
>
You have my
On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 12:14, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 31/05/2019 11:26, Paul Allen wrote:
>
>
>
> Example of the horrors of using canal for a leat with current carto:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/609805692#map=16/52.0804/-4.6799
> At z=19 it's actually close to the true width of the
On Friday 31 May 2019, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
> I suspect that the OSM Carto style would be open to pull requests
> that looked at the sub-tags of canals etc. if it could be done in a
> way that wasn't over-complicated - look at OSM Carto's handling of
> leaf type for a possible way forward.
On 31/05/2019 11:26, Paul Allen wrote:
Example of the horrors of using canal for a leat with current carto:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/609805692#map=16/52.0804/-4.6799
At z=19 it's actually close to the true width of the leat.
I suspect that the OSM Carto style would be open to pull
