Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-03-04 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi, Am 2017-03-04 um 15:02 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > mapping this kind of information (e.g. michelin star restaurants ) in a > structured and systematic way is likely forbidden because it means recreating > a (probably) proprietary db IMHO this is the only way who the friendliness of a

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-03-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 4 Mar 2017, at 13:50, Yves wrote: > > With signage I meant a particular signage, such as 'Recommended by the xyz > motorcycle club', recognized in some way and defined outside of OSM. > This kind of sign is rather frequent, and mapping them moves

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-03-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 4 Mar 2017, at 07:24, Yves wrote: > > If there is a signage, then we should map the signage. I don't agree that mapping the signage would be particularly helpful, besides there's no tag for this kind of signs, these sign objects wouldn't be

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-03-03 Thread Yves
I agree with Kenny, that's a bit too close to a rating system. If there is a signage, then we should map the signage. I f it's a particular service offered, then we should map the service. I'm particularly interested in kids friendly restaurants, and wonder if I'll pass a rainy weekend

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-03-03 Thread Kevin Kenny
I think I'd chime in with the people who are saying that the tag is quite subjective, except that I can think of a few cases where it isn't: http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/For-hikers-no-clean-laundry-in-Kent- 4738977.php#item-38493 in particular comes to mind. But in the absence of signage

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-03-03 Thread Warin
On 04-Mar-17 09:59 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: On 03/03/2017 04:56 PM, Warin wrote: Would I use friendly:*=no ... yes. There is one pub/fuel stop in Australia that is 'out of fuel' for motorcyclists ... but has it for cars. Definitely friendly:motorcycle=no! Very usefull to know that a motorcycle

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-03-03 Thread Shawn K. Quinn
On 03/03/2017 04:56 PM, Warin wrote: > Would I use friendly:*=no ... yes. There is one pub/fuel stop in > Australia that is 'out of fuel' for motorcyclists ... but has it for cars. > Definitely friendly:motorcycle=no! Very usefull to know that a > motorcycle needs enough fuel to get to the next

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-03-03 Thread Warin
On 03-Mar-17 09:21 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: On 03-Mar-17 09:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 2 Mar 2017, at 20:55, Tobias Knerr

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-03-03 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 03-Mar-17 09:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> >> sent from a phone >> >> On 2 Mar 2017, at 20:55, Tobias Knerr wrote: >>> >>> While it's ok to overlook minor "rule violations" sometimes, things

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-03-02 Thread Warin
On 03-Mar-17 09:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 2 Mar 2017, at 20:55, Tobias Knerr wrote: While it's ok to overlook minor "rule violations" sometimes, things like not announcing the vote do clearly have a big impact on the outcome. It's obvious

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-03-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 2 Mar 2017, at 20:55, Tobias Knerr wrote: > > While it's ok to overlook minor "rule violations" sometimes, things like not > announcing the vote do clearly have a big impact on the outcome. It's obvious > to me that the vote is invalid and needs

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-03-02 Thread Warin
On 03-Mar-17 06:55 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote: Hi Michael, On 02.03.2017 20:21, Michael Reichert wrote: Because the proposal violated the guideline, I would like to - remove the status "proposed" from its feature documentation page - reset the status of the proposal to "RFC" - to declare the

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-03-02 Thread Tobias Knerr
Hi Michael, On 02.03.2017 20:21, Michael Reichert wrote: Because the proposal violated the guideline, I would like to - remove the status "proposed" from its feature documentation page - reset the status of the proposal to "RFC" - to declare the voting as invalid by adding a note at the top of

[Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-03-02 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi, I have been informed by another mapper who uses XING (the German LikedIn) that there is a new tag motorcycle_friendly=yes. [1] Its wiki page says that the key has been proposed and accepted. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorcycle_friendly The proposal page can be found here: