On Wed, Jul 1, 2020, 09:21 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> Still, even that is
>
> "Ben Tilly reports on Ten Post Office Sq, Boston MA 02109 USA - which is
> not,
> reportedly, the same as 10 Post Office Sq, Boston MA 02109 USA."
>
yes and no.
Ben is alas co
sent from a phone
> On 2. Jul 2020, at 10:55, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote:
>
> I tagged it like that because I had trouble finding it when I had to go
> there to visit a patient.
established solution for this is using the key “ref”. addr:housename is about
addresses.
Cheers Martin
___
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 20:55:07 +0200
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>sent from a phone
>
>> On 1. Jul 2020, at 04:35, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Highly likely these are errors. However it is not impossible that a
>> number could be used as a house name.
>
>
>can you give an example?
>
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 20:00, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> > On 1. Jul 2020, at 12:55, Paul Allen wrote:
> >
> > Of
> > course, most people in the UK don't know that and just stick up a
> > house name or change an existing one without approval. Other
> > jurisdictions may not require approval.
sent from a phone
> On 1. Jul 2020, at 12:55, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Of
> course, most people in the UK don't know that and just stick up a
> house name or change an existing one without approval. Other
> jurisdictions may not require approval.
it does not mean we can not recognize the house
sent from a phone
> On 1. Jul 2020, at 04:35, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Highly likely these are errors. However it is not impossible that a number
> could be used as a house name.
can you give an example?
By which definition a number written as number can be a „name“?
If it
Jul 1, 2020, 13:49 by ajt1...@gmail.com:
>
> On 30/06/2020 14:06, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>
>> We have 15000 addresses such as addr:housename=3 (
>> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/VBS )
>>
>> Is there some chance that any of them is valid? Because it seems to me that
>> editors should
On 30/06/2020 14:06, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
We have 15000 addresses such as addr:housename=3 (
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/VBS )
Is there some chance that any of them is valid? Because it seems to me
that
editors should complain about addr:housename with just numbers.
Any? Qu
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 03:35, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Highly likely these are errors. However it is not impossible that a number
>
> could be used as a house name.
>
>
Not impossible. But very unlikely. In the UK, you're meant to get your
house name approved by the local authori
Hi *
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 03:16:38PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> sent from a phone
> > On 30. Jun 2020, at 15:08, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> > wrote:
> >
> > Is there some chance that any of them is valid?
>
>
> IMHO not, these are likely autocompletion bloopers. I’d support
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 12:26, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>
> The query only returns a count of how many elements it found. If you want
> to map them you'll need a modified version:
>
> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/VDp
>
Thanks!
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing l
On 30/6/20 11:16 pm, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 30. Jun 2020, at 15:08, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
wrote:
Is there some chance that any of them is valid?
IMHO not, these are likely autocompletion bloopers.
Highly likely these are errors. However it is not imposs
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:15 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> " This query returned no nodes. In OSM, only nodes contain coordinates.
> For example, a way cannot be displayed without its nodes"
>
> Is there a hiccup in the way it's written, or is my system playing up this
> morning?
>
The query onl
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 23:08, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> We have 15000 addresses such as addr:housename=3 (
> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/VBS )
>
That search is producing an error for me, once over Australia & then again
for Western Europe:
" This query re
sent from a phone
> On 30. Jun 2020, at 15:08, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> Is there some chance that any of them is valid?
IMHO not, these are likely autocompletion bloopers. I’d support an automatic
retagging effort to addr:housenumber (unless there is already a different
We have 15000 addresses such as addr:housename=3 (
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/VBS )
Is there some chance that any of them is valid? Because it seems to me that
editors should complain about addr:housename with just numbers.
I want to check worldwide situation before proposing doing it in say JOS
16 matches
Mail list logo
