Re: [Tagging] Lifeguards

drew.harv...@gmail.com>> *Sent:* Friday, 8 June 2018 20:41 *To:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org>> *Subject:* Re: [Tagging] Lifeguards I strongly disagree that they are the same, they are used to map different thin

Re: [Tagging] Lifeguards

elated tools < > tagging@openstreetmap.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Tagging] Lifeguards > > > > I strongly disagree that they are the same, they are used to map different > things > Thanks, everyone, that's fine - keep it as 5 separate definitions, but, I would think, all

Re: [Tagging] Lifeguards

I agree that the 5 different values shown on the wiki describe distinctly different things and should all be retained. From: Andrew Harvey Sent: Friday, 8 June 2018 20:41 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Lifeguards I strongly disagree that they are

Re: [Tagging] Lifeguards

I strongly disagree that they are the same, they are used to map different things, as noted on the wiki by the detailed descriptions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aemergency#Lifeguards. Low usage is likely just because there aren't that many of these in the real world and not many peopl

Re: [Tagging] Lifeguards

8. Jun 2018 00:54 by graemefi...@gmail.com : > What does everybody think? Are you proposing a mechanical edit or adding recommendation on wiki or something else? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org ht

[Tagging] Lifeguards

Hi Just raised (or re-raised) the suggestion that lifeguard stations https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aemergency should be rendered https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4918#event-1668877116, as it could be a potentially life-saving addition to the map. Bryan had quite correctly poi