Among other reasons, a managed forest, if it stops being actively managed, will
gradually revert over time into a wild woodland, as other species start moving
back in.
On March 31, 2015 5:16:10 PM CDT, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > Am 31.03.2015 um 12:52 schrieb Daniel Koć :
> >
> Am 31.03.2015 um 12:52 schrieb Daniel Koć :
>
> So we have a simple hierarchy:
>
> landuse (implies)=> landcover
no, it doesn't imply
>
> but you have to know there is a "use" at all to tag it as "landuse". Since
> the trees may not be used (like in natural=wood), your statement is fa
W dniu 31.03.2015 10:18, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
I have for long been promoting a clearer approach for this kind of
mess, and I agree that there would be need to implement some changes.
While my propositions are much more than this (I'd like to fix more
fundamental issues), I'm happy
2015-03-31 0:37 GMT+02:00 Daniel Koć :
>
> OSM was started as a middle-scale map of a big European city, hence:
>
> 1. Highways were meant to be just crossing lines from GPS (=just routing
> and macro-to-middle-scale rendering).
>
+1, and this hasn't changed. area:highway is a completely differe
W dniu 30.03.2015 22:24, fly napisał(a):
In general area=yes/no is broken. Usually, there should not be a
problem
to get the information from the object (type).
You seem to be talking about interpreting data already in the database
("forest is an area" - of course! =} ), while I'm talking ab
Am 30.03.2015 um 17:02 schrieb Daniel Koć:
In general area=yes/no is broken. Usually, there should not be a problem
to get the information from the object (type).
With some tags which are valid for closed (area) and unclosed ways we
have problems and the best we can do, is to define one solution
W dniu 30.03.2015 18:07, Mateusz Konieczny napisał(a):
Mapping street areas should not use [highway=*; area=yes] -
[area:highway=*] is much better.
That's exactly what was proposed regarding street areas:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area#Tagging
but I wouldn't
Mapping street areas should not use [highway=*; area=yes] -
[area:highway=*] is much better.
highway=pedestrian, highway=footway for squares are special cases as square
may and typically is traversed using any route.
Also some [highway=service; area=yes] fit (some parkings and similar
places) as i
Lately I was trying to rethink our general tagging schemes and came up
with the impression that areas half-designed part of OSM tagging system.
IMO we have 2 problems with it: small one in microscale and a big one in
macroscale, but most probably we can deal with them separately.
***
In micr
