On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 16:43 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/11/23 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
What would the correct highway classification be for an Oregon
beach?
These fall under the Oregon Department of Transportation's
On 24/11/2011 18:15, Paul Johnson wrote:
Well, if we're going to exclude ways from being ways because they're not
improved for vehicular use, then i have a lot of cattle trails I need to
remove (despite being named, with addresses along them, open to vehicles
and accessible by 4x4).
That's not
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 21:09 +, Dave F. wrote:
On 24/11/2011 18:15, Paul Johnson wrote:
Well, if we're going to exclude ways from being ways because they're not
improved for vehicular use, then i have a lot of cattle trails I need to
remove (despite being named, with addresses along
Dave F. wrote:
That's not what he said, you know it. Typical Paul I ignore
facts just so I can start an argument Johnson.
Traditionally I try to act as an administrator rather than a moderator on
this list, but I think that oversteps the mark a little, I'm afraid. By all
means disagree on the
On 11/24/2011 5:10 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
That's not what he said, you know it. Typical Paul I ignore
facts just so I can start an argument Johnson.
Traditionally I try to act as an administrator rather than a moderator on
this list, but I think that oversteps the mark a
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 17:18 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 11/24/2011 5:10 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
That's not what he said, you know it. Typical Paul I ignore
facts just so I can start an argument Johnson.
Traditionally I try to act as an administrator rather
From a hikers point of view I'd like to see some differentiation of tide
affected ways. There's a number of tracks I didn't put on the map because I
wasn't sure the tidal info placed in side tags would get to rendered. Use
of difficulty scales doesn't quite warn someone either. I know given the
I can see both sides of the argument. We don't want too much
proliferation of special road types - we already have ice roads, now
tidal is suggested, there could easily be dry weather only (or
not-monsoon only), 4wd only, summer only, etc. How far do we want to
take this?
On the other hand, we
Good suggestion. How about provisional instead of special?
On Nov 25, 2011 12:17 PM, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see both sides of the argument. We don't want too much
proliferation of special road types - we already have ice roads, now
tidal is suggested, there could easily be
2011/11/25 Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com:
If we do want to separate them out, my suggestion is to use a single
road type tag to indicate one of these special roads -
highway=special_road (and maybe highway=special_path). Then extra
tagging to differentiate them
2011/11/22 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
On 22/11/2011 21:33, Frederik Ramm wrote:
When you say No, don't you mean Yes? Not sure if you are responding to
the original post, or to my reaction. All it says on the proposal page is A
road that gets tidally flooded . Where do you get your
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 11/23/2011 5:40 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Yes, this would fit the proposed tag. As you can see from your picture
not beeing aware about the tide situation can cost your life. IMHO
this kind of road merits its own main highway tag, it
2011/11/23 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 11/23/2011 5:40 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Yes, this would fit the proposed tag. As you can see from your picture
not beeing aware about the tide situation can cost your life. IMHO
this kind of road merits its own main highway tag, it
Hi,
On 11/22/11 21:48, Colin Smale wrote:
Surely the road in this case simply has tide-related opening times (and
a variable surface?). It may be secondary, tertiary, unclassified or
whatever. The fact that it is sometimes closed by the tide should be
tagged separately from the type of road.
2011/11/23 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
I meant: No, the fact that it is sometimes closed by the tide should not be
tagged separately from the type of road, because I am not talking about
something that is 'basically a normal road just with an extra property'; I
am talking about
Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 November 2011 16:00, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Don't know, but it is certainly not tidal_road, as that proposal says
a road that gets tidally flooded. You are not describing a road.
What would you classify it as if the same way
2011/11/23 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
What would the correct highway classification be for an Oregon
beach?
These fall under the Oregon Department of Transportation's
jurisdiction
despite not being improved for vehicular use (and trying will
This is the proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tidal_road
there is also
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tidalflat_path
which might soon become tidal_path
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
On 22/11/2011 20:45, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
This is the proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tidal_road
Surely the road in this case simply has tide-related opening times (and
a variable surface?). It may be secondary, tertiary, unclassified or
whatever. The fact
Hi,
On 11/22/2011 09:17 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
Surely the road in this case simply has tide-related opening times (and
a variable surface?). It may be secondary, tertiary, unclassified or
whatever. The fact that it is sometimes closed by the tide should be
tagged separately from the type of
On 22/11/2011 21:33, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 11/22/2011 09:17 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
Surely the road in this case simply has tide-related opening times (and
a variable surface?). It may be secondary, tertiary, unclassified or
whatever. The fact that it is sometimes closed by the tide
On 22/11/2011 20:33, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 11/22/2011 09:17 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
Surely the road in this case simply has tide-related opening times (and
a variable surface?). It may be secondary, tertiary, unclassified or
whatever. The fact that it is sometimes closed by the tide
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:59 +, Dave F. wrote:
On 22/11/2011 20:33, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 11/22/2011 09:17 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
Surely the road in this case simply has tide-related opening times (and
a variable surface?). It may be secondary, tertiary, unclassified or
On 23 November 2011 16:00, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Don't know, but it is certainly not tidal_road, as that proposal says
a road that gets tidally flooded. You are not describing a road.
What would you classify it as if the same way happened to be inland,
with no tides involved?
24 matches
Mail list logo
