Re: [Tagging] RFC: property for the presence of pitch markings
On 27/07/18 20:28, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: I agree with both of you that lines: seems a better way to deal with the specifics. I wasn’t aware there is already something in use. Don't know if it has much use. I used as a template the basketball page to create the netball page, so I have some familiarity with it. I recall I have used the lines for a 3 sport pitch situation IIRC .. tennis, basketball and netball. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] RFC: property for the presence of pitch markings
I agree with both of you that lines: seems a better way to deal with the specifics. I wasn’t aware there is already something in use. cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] RFC: property for the presence of pitch markings
Hi, Martin, What about if there is a basketball pitch (basketball hoops are on the pitch) but lines are for futsal only? Maybe some like this? leisure=pitch pitch=basket; futsal lines:futsal =yes lines:basketball =no Yours, José 2018-07-27 0:43 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > On 26/07/18 23:49, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> Please comment on this proposal for a property to denote the presence of >> pitch markings / field markings. >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/pitch_markings >> >> I would particularly be interested to learn from you, if there should be >> suggestions for more detail (e.g. multiple overlapping markings, fainted >> /incomplete markings, ) to cram into the values, or if a simple yes/no >> seems more appropriate. >> >> > The basketball wiki page has suggestions for line makings .. > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dbasketball > > lines:basketball=yes/red/yellow/* > > The tag allows multiple sport lines in different colours. > > I think it should only be used on paved areas, other surfaces are too > temporary unless well maintained. > > - > > The leisure=pitch is not a usefull combination .. it is a 'required > combination'. > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] RFC: property for the presence of pitch markings
On 26/07/18 23:49, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Please comment on this proposal for a property to denote the presence of pitch markings / field markings. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/pitch_markings I would particularly be interested to learn from you, if there should be suggestions for more detail (e.g. multiple overlapping markings, fainted /incomplete markings, ) to cram into the values, or if a simple yes/no seems more appropriate. The basketball wiki page has suggestions for line makings .. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dbasketball lines:basketball=yes/red/yellow/* The tag allows multiple sport lines in different colours. I think it should only be used on paved areas, other surfaces are too temporary unless well maintained. - The leisure=pitch is not a usefull combination .. it is a 'required combination'. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] RFC: property for the presence of pitch markings
Please comment on this proposal for a property to denote the presence of pitch markings / field markings. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/pitch_markings I would particularly be interested to learn from you, if there should be suggestions for more detail (e.g. multiple overlapping markings, fainted /incomplete markings, ) to cram into the values, or if a simple yes/no seems more appropriate. Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging