2013/2/4 yve...@gmail.com yve...@gmail.com:
There is already route=piste relations (the colors on the link provided).
This is something else.
what kind of objects do you propose would be grouped in these site
relations, just the nordic piste or also connected services, hotels,
etc.? I guess
I think relations are not applicable for this case. To me it seems as if
you want to put everything from inside a village in one relation, because
they are all in that village. That's just not how OSM works. Either that
resort has borders, and you draw them, or the ski lifts and piste have the
2013/2/4 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com:
I think relations are not applicable for this case. To me it seems as if you
want to put everything from inside a village in one relation, because they
are all in that village. That's just not how OSM works. Either that resort
has borders, and you draw
2013/2/4 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
if they don't have a common operator and the resort doesn't have a
border (i.e. it isn't an area but a mixture of areas and routes) you
cannot map them? Btw.: the OP is asking for nordic pistes, so there
won't necessarily be any lifts.
2013/2/4 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com
2013/2/4 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
if they don't have a common operator and the resort doesn't have a
border (i.e. it isn't an area but a mixture of areas and routes) you
cannot map them? Btw.: the OP is asking for nordic pistes, so
2013/2/4 Ronnie Soak chaoschaos0...@googlemail.com
Works exactly as long as no piste belongs to more than one resort. If
anyone does, you still need to switch to relations.
I don't know about nordic pistes, but there are definitely lifts for
alpine pistes that are used by visitors of two ski
Janko, to group a bunch of elements into a relation or add same a tag
to all these elements is not quite the same. A relation carry a meaning
(type), while with all these tags, It's seems to me just a collection
that you can find with a query :)
(Actually, we all know that both are technically
2013/2/4 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com
2013/2/4 Ronnie Soak chaoschaos0...@googlemail.com
Works exactly as long as no piste belongs to more than one resort. If
anyone does, you still need to switch to relations.
I don't know about nordic pistes, but there are definitely lifts for
alpine
Am 04.02.2013 19:00, schrieb yvecai:
Janko, to group a bunch of elements into a relation or add same a tag
to all these elements is not quite the same. A relation carry a
meaning (type), while with all these tags, It's seems to me just a
collection that you can find with a query :)
(Actually,
On 02/04/2013 08:26 PM, Peter Wendorff wrote:
...
There is always an overpass query for every need :)
Anyway, these site=piste relation members would simply be related by ...
ski.
Minimal tagging would be:
type=site
site=piste
piste:type=nordic
or
type=site
site=piste
2013/2/4 yvecai yve...@gmail.com:
Anyway, these site=piste relation members would simply be related by ...
ski.
Minimal tagging would be:
type=site
site=piste
piste:type=nordic
or
type=site
site=piste
piste:type=downhill
Then, optionnally, name, operator, url.
aren't there resorts
There is already route=piste relations (the colors on the link provided).
This is something else.
Yves
- Reply message -
De : Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
Pour : Tag discussion, strategy and related tools tagging@openstreetmap.org
Objet : [Tagging] Ski resort (once again)
12 matches
Mail list logo
