On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 12:20, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
> I hope to find consensus for how to tag artworks with multiple parts,
> as a relation.
> We could use relation_type:set (which I used for the Moonstones) or
> define a new relation_type:artwork
To further complicate matters I have had an
I would quite happily call a collection of statues near to each other an
"artistic site", similar to a wind farm being a collection of turbines
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:49 PM Andy Mabbett
wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 12:41, marc marc wrote:
> >
> > Le 06.02.20 à 13:20, Andy Mabbett a écrit
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 12:41, marc marc wrote:
>
> Le 06.02.20 à 13:20, Andy Mabbett a écrit :
> > We could use relation_type:set
>
> why not using relation type=site that already exist ?
Because they are not a "site".
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
Le 06.02.20 à 13:20, Andy Mabbett a écrit :
> We could use relation_type:set
why not using relation type=site that already exist ?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I hope to find consensus for how to tag artworks with multiple parts,
as a relation. Here are some examples:
Nine 'Moonstones', including:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2501118658
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2501118659
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2501118660
