Hi all,
thanks for comments. Makes me think about validation. Is there a validator
that can be used to compare the accepted schemes to what the actual tagging
is? For example, is it possible to validate against manually constructed
schemes in JOSM? Is it possible to view osmose errors on certain o
2016-07-14 12:53 GMT+02:00 Kieron Thwaites :
> Yes, it's two different tagging schemes. "station=subway" belongs to
> the legacy station mapping scheme, while "subway=yes" belongs to the
> more detailed (and more complex) public transport schema, and is (or
> should be!) found together with a pub
On 14 July 2016 at 12:24, Bjoern Hassler wrote:
> (1) both "line" and "tube" are in use to designate lines (e.g.
> "Piccaddilly;Bakerloo"). Only one of them tends to be filled. I assume this
> should all be "line"?
I'd actually tag this as the name=* of the route_master relation.
Open to hearing
Hi all, hi Kieran, hi Richard,
Another question: Looking at the stations,
(1) both "line" and "tube" are in use to designate lines (e.g.
"Piccaddilly;Bakerloo"). Only one of them tends to be filled. I assume this
should all be "line"?
(2) Also, I assume the ";" as a separator is correct?
I.e. Pi
Bjoern Hassler wrote:
> Second question: network. The wiki page
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/London_public_transport_tagging_scheme
> doesn't say much about "network", and these values are in use:
>
> - London Underground
> - National Rail
> - Network Rail
> - London Overground
> - TfL
> -
On 14 July 2016 at 01:45, Bjoern Hassler wrote:
>
> First question: operator. Should this be "Transport for London" or the
> actual operator? TfL owns and retains branding control, but technically it's
> franchised to London Overground Rail Operations (LOROL) and KeolisAmey
> Docklands Ltd., who a
Hi all,
(Cross-posting to tagging and talk-gb-london.)
I've been looking at
type=public_transport
public_transport=stop_area
relations in Transport for London.
*First question: operator. *Should this be "Transport for London" or the
actual operator? TfL owns and retains branding control, but t