Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-28 Thread Selfish Seahorse
On 28 November 2017 at 19:32, José G Moya Y. wrote: > This response makes me wonder if there is a way to mark the "thermoking not > allowed to park" sign I've read in some gas station truck parkings. I couldn't find a temperature control tag or any similar tag in taginfo

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-28 Thread Selfish Seahorse
On 28 November 2017 at 12:58, Simon Poole wrote: > In general the access categories and rules for "traffic at rest" are > different, than for moving traffic. > > As to sign C, 3a (Vienna convention), the OSM access wiki page is a bit > unclear in that it doesn't clearly state that

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-28 Thread José G Moya Y .
This response makes me wonder if there is a way to mark the "thermoking not allowed to park" sign I've read in some gas station truck parkings. I imagine there are "dangerous goods no" and "dangerous goods designated" tag values, also. El 28/11/2017 18:10, "Paul Johnson"

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-28 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Selfish Seahorse wrote: > On 28 November 2017 at 11:26, Georg Feddern wrote: > > Yes, unfortunately the european common-in-use traffic sign "VEHICLES > > PROHIBITED EXCEPT MOTORBIKE/SIDECAR" or "Prohibited for

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-28 Thread Simon Poole
In general the access categories and rules for "traffic at rest" are different, than for moving traffic. As to sign C, 3a (Vienna convention), the OSM access wiki page is a bit unclear in that it doesn't clearly state that when used in a prohibitory fashion "motorcar" includes all other dual

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-28 Thread Colin Smale
On 2017-11-28 11:26, Georg Feddern wrote: > Am 28.11.2017 um 10:00 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > On 27. Nov 2017, at 13:51, Selfish Seahorse wrote: > > Sorry for asking again, but does anyone know if motorcar=no implies > that there is no access for all multi-track

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-28 Thread Georg Feddern
Am 28.11.2017 um 11:54 schrieb Selfish Seahorse: On 28 November 2017 at 11:26, Georg Feddern wrote: Yes, unfortunately the european common-in-use traffic sign "VEHICLES PROHIBITED EXCEPT MOTORBIKE/SIDECAR" or "Prohibited for any double-tracked motor vehicles" has no

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-28 Thread Selfish Seahorse
On 28 November 2017 at 11:26, Georg Feddern wrote: > Yes, unfortunately the european common-in-use traffic sign "VEHICLES > PROHIBITED EXCEPT MOTORBIKE/SIDECAR" or "Prohibited for any double-tracked > motor vehicles" has no equivalent in the OSM access scheme. > I think it

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-28 Thread David Swarthout
Chiang Mai, Thailand From: Georg Feddern <o...@bavarianmallet.de> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 5:26:12 PM To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Tagging] Road barrier Am 28.11.2017 um 10:00 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: On 27. Nov 2017, at 13:51, S

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-28 Thread Georg Feddern
Am 28.11.2017 um 10:00 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: On 27. Nov 2017, at 13:51, Selfish Seahorse > wrote: Sorry for asking again, but does anyone know if motorcar=no implies that there is no access for all multi-track motor vehicles

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-28 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 27. Nov 2017, at 13:51, Selfish Seahorse wrote: > > Sorry for asking again, but does anyone know if motorcar=no implies > that there is no access for all multi-track motor vehicles or only for > motorcars? In case hgv are permitted I’d

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-27 Thread Selfish Seahorse
Sorry for asking again, but does anyone know if motorcar=no implies that there is no access for all multi-track motor vehicles or only for motorcars? Thanks ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-25 Thread Volker Schmidt
The wiki appears to clear: barrier=bollard " Implies area=no access=no foot=yes bicycle=yes " On 25 Nov 2017 12:25 a.m., "marc marc" wrote: > Le 25. 11. 17 à 00:05, Selfish Seahorse a écrit : > >

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-25 Thread Selfish Seahorse
On 25 November 2017 at 00:24, marc marc wrote: > This sign doesn't block mofa. I tag this as : motorcar=no motorcycle=no > > Depending of your country, rules may be different ( some use > motor_vehicle=no mofa=yes ) Does motorcar=no imply 'no' for all multi-track motor

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-24 Thread Paul Johnson
Most data consumers seem to treat barrier=* as access=no by default; it's a good idea with barriers to explicitly tag for access on barriers. On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 5:24 PM, marc marc wrote: > Le 25. 11. 17 à 00:05, Selfish Seahorse a écrit : > >

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-24 Thread marc marc
Le 25. 11. 17 à 00:05, Selfish Seahorse a écrit : > > > Is barrier = yes (+ bicycle = yes + foot = yes + motor_vehicle = no) > enough information for routing engines? This sign doesn't block mofa. I tag this as : motorcar=no

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-24 Thread ael
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:05:10AM +0100, Selfish Seahorse wrote: > Hi > > How is this kind of road barrier that prevents access for motor > vehicles but allows pedestrians and cyclists to pass on both sides > best tagged? > > > I have

[Tagging] Road barrier

2017-11-24 Thread Selfish Seahorse
Hi How is this kind of road barrier that prevents access for motor vehicles but allows pedestrians and cyclists to pass on both sides best tagged? Is barrier = yes (+ bicycle = yes + foot = yes + motor_vehicle = no) enough information